Laserfiche WebLink
i r ~ -- <br />and other changes to the extent they would affect the cost estimate. There are revisions <br />in Tab 12 regarding disturbance areas, and Tab 20 regarding disturbance acreages, <br />material balance/volumes, and postmine drainage channels. Please let me know if you <br />are under the understanding that SCC was planning to submit additional <br />documentation to support a lower cost amount (I have lost track of whose court the <br />ball was in on the cost estimate for II-W). <br />Sandy: <br />Please look at the Item 1 responses regarding disturbed acreage delineations, and advise <br />as to how you think we should proceed on that, in the interest of consistency (I probably <br />created some confusion on this one). Also, you might want to look at how SCC <br />responded to Item 8 regarding topsoil replacement, and let me know if you have <br />comments on that. I think it needs to be tightened up. <br />Please let me know if any of you have questions. <br />Thanks. <br />