My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV03490
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV03490
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:01:20 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:08:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/13/2006
Doc Name
Adequacy Response Review
From
Dan Mathews
To
Sandy Brown, MikeBoulay, Jim Stark, Byron Walker
Type & Sequence
PR5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_ ~,~ <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832$106 <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION O F <br />MIN SRALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION•MIN ING <br />SAEETY•SCIENCE <br />DATE: February 13, 2006 <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />TO: Sandy Brown, Mike ulay, Jim Stark, Byron Walker <br />Russell George <br />Executive DIreLTOr <br />FROM: Dan Mathews ~ Ronald W. Canany <br />Division Director <br />RE: Seneca II-W PR-5 Adequacy Response Review Natural Resource Trus[ee <br />Seneca Coal Company <br />Permit No. C-1982-057 <br />Sandy, <br />I need to request the review assistance of yourself, Mike Boulay, Jim Stark, and Byron <br />Walker, in regard to the above referenced adequacy response review. Seneca Coal <br />Company (SCC) submitted respo9nses to our adequacy letters of July 11, 2005 and <br />August 25, 2005, under cover letter dated January 31, 2006. I would like to receive <br />review memos by March 9, 2006. <br />From the individuals involved in the review I would like to request the following: <br />Mike: <br />Please review the responses to Items 10 through I7, and associated revisions to postmine <br />channel designs, SEDCAD designs, drainage and sediment control plans, and stock pond <br />designs. <br />Byron: <br />Please review the responses to Item 6 and associated amendments to Tab 20 text, new <br />Attachment 20-2A Pit Backfil] Stability Report, and revised Map Exhibit 20-2 and <br />associated cross-sections relevant to slope stability. <br />Jim: <br />This submittal does not explicitly respond to the cost estimate, but Roy Karo indicated <br />that he thought the cost estimate issues of dispute were now in our court. Given that the <br />disturbance acreages have been revised per Item 1, and that revised postmine channel <br />designs have been provided, the cost estimate probably needs to be adjusted to <br />incorporate these changes. Please review SCC's responses to Item 1, Item 4, Item 16, <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Office of Office of Colorado <br />Mined Land Reclamation Active and Inactive Mines Geological Survey <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.