My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV03433
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV03433
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:01:15 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:08:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978011
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/16/1990
Doc Name
AMENDMENT TO PN M-78-11 ROBINSON BRICK CO BUFFALO MINE 2ND ADEQUACY REPLY
From
ROBINSON BRICK CO
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i • III liilllllllllllli <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLu1tAllU <br />MINED'C`AND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />7313 Sherman St.. Room 215 <br />Denver. CO 80203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />FA X: 303 832-8106 <br />March 13, 1990 <br />htr. Michael Leidich <br />Robinson Brick Company <br />1845 West Dartmouth ` <br />P.O. Box 5243 <br />Denver, Colorado 80217-5243 <br />RE: Amendment to Permit M-78-011, Buffalo Mine Adequacy Review <br />Dear Mr. Leidich: <br />OF CG(O <br />Ye "+il..~ G <br />~\~, <br />lg fb• <br />Roy Rome. <br />Govema <br />Fred R Bama. <br />Dnis~on D:rr_tor <br />As we discussed by telephone today, March 13, 1990, there are only a few <br />outstanding issues prior to our recommended approval of this amendment. <br />Our hydrology questions were faxed to you earlier today, I am enclosing <br />another copy to make this correspondence complete. Our other concerns are as <br />follows: <br />1. The proposed wheat x wheatgrass cover crop seed should be reduced <br />to 5 pounds/acre. <br />2. Volumes of material which will have to be cut from the highwal7 <br />during reclamation req_radinq_ to achieve a 3:1 reclaimed slope <br />should be calculated. <br />3. Exhibit L - Reclamation Costs - should be recalculated to reflect <br />the extra seed and the cut and fill grading activity. <br />If you have any questions about these comments please contact me, <br />Sincerely, <br />Gregg ~. Squire <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />ORS/yjb <br />Enclosure(s) <br />5087E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.