Laserfiche WebLink
ENERGY FUELS COAL, INC. <br />SOUTHFIELD MINE <br />TR-15 MID-TERM ADEQUACY REVIEW RESPONSES (SET II) <br />NOVEMBER 1993 <br />LEGAL, FINANCIAL, AND COMPLIANCE INFORMATION (FROM 6/6/93 LETTER) <br />The following is a list of adequary concerns for the Southfield Mine in the identification of interest <br />section of the permit. <br />1. The Employer /dentifzcation Numbers ~EIN~are needed for EFCI, Flying Diamond Resources, <br />Ltd., and Energy Fuels Corporation, Ltd. <br />2. Since Flying Dramond Resources, Ltd. is listed as the sole shareholder of EFCI, a current list <br />of all officers and directors is needed. <br />3. Page 1.03-16R and 1.03-17 in the permit do not correlate with one another. Some of the <br />information was apparently omitted from page 2.03-16R, <br />4, The relationship between Energy Fuels Associates, EFCI, and Energy Fuels Corporation is not <br />clearly staled in the permit. Please have Energy Fuels define these relationships more clearly. <br />Response: Appropriatepages in Section 2.03 have been revised to address the noted information <br />needs. The revised pages accompany these responses for replacement in the permit application <br />document. <br />LAND USE <br />Adequacy Izem No. 7 -Signed letters documenting landowner concurrence with proposed postmining <br />land use. <br />Response: EFCI has provided the DMG with a copy of the EFCI letter to landowners <br />documenting the request for landowner concurrence relative to postmining land use. <br />Accompanying these responses are copies of the certified mail receipts and signed landowner <br />letters received to date. EFCI will follow up with those landowners who have not returned <br />signed letters and will forward any additional letters which are returned upon receipt. <br />WATER RIGHTS AND REPLACEMENT <br />Adequary /zem No. ]I -North mine dewatering well permit issues. <br />Response: As noted in the previous EFCI Mid-Term Adequacy Responses, evaporative losses <br />related to mine dewatering activities are of such limited magnitude as to be insignificant relative <br />to either surface or ground water availability within the drainage basin. Further, the <br />presump[ion that ground water in the mine area would be available to downstream users has <br />no reasonable basis in fact since all available information indicates that potential water-bearing <br />units associated with the mined sequence have limited lateral continuity. <br />EFCI feels that the request for an augmentation plan based on evaporative losses is unreasonable <br />since it does not take into consideration known relevant hydrologic information. Consistent <br />TerraMatrix/ACZ Inc. * P.O. Box 774018 "Steamboat Springs, Colo>ado 80977 * 1303) 879.6160 <br />