Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Departmem of natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51.. Room ?t> <br />Denver, Colorado 80?03 <br />Phone: 130] 1 866 ~ 3>6,' <br />fAX: 13031 87?8106 <br />June 14,2000 <br />~ iii iiiiiiiiniii iii <br />STATE OF CCLORr~DO <br />fOR YOUR CORRESPONDENCE FILE <br />Mr. Scott Lewis, Manager of Environmental Affairs <br />Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Co. <br />P.O. Box 191 <br />Victor, CO 80860 <br />RE: Adequacy comments, Permit No. bI-1980-244, Cresson Project, AM-08 <br />Dear Mr. Lewis: <br />The Division has reviewed your Amendment Application and has the following comments: <br />GENERAL <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERAL S <br />GEOLOGY <br />R E C L A M A T I O N <br />MINING•SAFETY <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Greg E. watcher <br />E ~ecuove Dmecmr <br />Michael B. Long <br />Dwisian Direao~ <br />The application appeared [o be well prepared and all the required information under the Rules and the Act is <br />provided. However, since [he Amendment relied a great deal on materials covered under AM-07, it would have <br />been helpful if the operator had provided the permit areas approved under AM-07 to give the reader a <br />comparison of the changes requested under AM-08. Also, it would have been helpful if the contour intervals <br />were placed in the maps legend. <br />Each of three separate mine pit wall slope stability reports addresses the potentially destabilizing effects of <br />water. Water can destabilize the mine pit walls by reducing effective stress on potentially skidding surfaces, and <br />by increasing the driving pressure on the potentially failing rock mass. As Adrian Brown Consultants observed, <br />"The combing[ion of these two effects is that mine wall stability is a strong function of ground water condition." <br />Mines excavated beneath a standing ground water table can result in seepage from saturated bedrock into the <br />mine pit. The presence of ground water can, therefore, result in less stable mine walls. <br />Historically [he Cripple Creek and Victor areas were mined largely by underground mining techniques. Ground <br />water seepage into underground workings necessitated dewatering and caused roof and rib instability. As in <br />many historic mining areas, dewa[ering tunnels were driven beneath the ground mass being mined to dewater <br />the ore body and eliminate ground water problems. In the case o the Cripple Creek and Victor mining area three <br />tunnels were driven. Each subsequent tunnel was a thousand feet deeper than the previous one to allow mining <br />to progress deeper in the diatreme. The Moffat tunnel was installed at 9,000 feet above sea level in 1900. The <br />Roosevelt tunnel was installed at 8,000 feet above sea level in the 1920's. The Carlton tunnel was installed at <br />7,000 feet above sea level in the 1940's. These tunnels appear to have been relatively effective in dewaterino the <br />overlying rock mass. <br />Each of [he three separate mine pit wall slope stability evaluations concluded that because the rock mass is <br />dewatered ;round water will not destabilize the pit walls. The past decade's experience in the Main Cresson <br />Mine has verified [he analyst's assumption. However, the Main Cresson pit immediately' surrounds the Cresson <br />underground workings, known to connect directh to the Carlton Tunnel. The possibility exists that mine pits <br />excavated farther from the dewaterins tunnels may encounter eround water conditions. If ground water is <br />encountered b}' any of the Cresson mine pits, the stability of the effected pit walls will need to be re-eculuated <br />by CCSV in a timely fashion. <br />