REV01821 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Lick Creek. The community does not appear to be delineated on Map 42, but it may be the case that the wet meadows are inclusions located entirely within the boundaries of the riparian vegetation community, which is delineated on the map along Dry Fork and Lick Creek. Please clarify if this is the case, or amend the map as appropriate to delineate wet meadow communities that occur outside the boundaries of the riparian community. 2. Rule 2.04.10(5) requires an evaluation of the potential for impacts to rare and endangered plant species. The applicant has properly updated T&E information for PR-10 on amended page 2.04-156. The information indicates that only two listed plant species occur within the general area (clay loving wild buckwheat, and Uinta Basin hookless cactus) but that suitable habitat for either species does not occur within the permit area. It appears that the information provided has adequately addressed the cited requirement. In addition, The Division has solicited comments from the the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regarding the potential for impacts to listed species. The applicant has also provided information regarding several sensitive plant species that could potentially occur within the permit area, although their presence has not been documented. Because the PR-10 revision application does not propose additional surface disturbance, it is extremely unlikely that these species would be affected, should they occur within the permit area. No further information is requested of the applicant with respect to rare and endangered plant species. 2.04.12 Prime Farmland 3. The Division has previously made a negative determination for the presence of prime farmlands within the current permit area. The applicant has included updated information on amended page 2.04-173 and within Exhibit 39, which documents that there are no prime farmlands within the proposed SOD permit extension area. Exhibit 39 updates include March 2004 correspondence from appropriate USFS and NRCS officials, which adequately documents that there is no prime farmland within the proposed SOD permit extension area. No further information is requested of the applicant with respect to prime farmland. 2.06.8 Alluvial Vallev Floors Alluvial Valley Floor Reconnaissance Investigations and DMG Determinations The applicant has not provided amended information specifically addressing the alluvial valley floor (AVF) requirements of Rule 2.06.8, as a part of the PR-10 revision application, for E-Seam Mining within the proposed SOD permit extension area. Information regarding alluvial valley floors within the permit and adjacent area is presented in Section 2.06.8 of the approved permit application package, and in Section XVII of the Division's July 2001 Findings of Compliance document far Permit Renewal No. 4 (RN-4). Information in these documents indicates that reconnaissance alluvial valley floor investigations have previously been conducted by the operator within the 40-year life-of-mine lease boundary and hydrologically adjacent areas. As such, the study would appear to have encompassed the proposed SOD permit extension area and adjacent areas, including the Minnesota Creek and Dry Fork of Minnesota Creek drainage basins. The study may also have included the Deep Creek drainage, but this is not clear from the RN-4 findings document or the application narrative. 2