Laserfiche WebLink
established vegetative regime which supports these land uses is a perennial pastureland. This <br />approved vegetative type differs considerably from the pre-mining vegetation communities which <br />were oak brush herbaceous and sagebrush herbaceous. <br />Reclamation and seeding of the disturbed areas contributing runoff and sediment to impoundments <br />001 and 002 occurred in late September and early October 1987. The seed mixture used is the seed <br />mixture specified in TR-51 and listed in Table 2.05.10 of the H-G Coal Company Technical Permit <br />Revision Application - TR-62. <br />Monitoring of revegetation success has been conducted periodically since 1987. Vegetative <br />productivity data collected from reclaimed areas in 1990 indicated successful establishment of <br />revegetation according to the criteria for evaluating Phase II bond release. <br />Field revegetative success monitoring conducted by HGCC in 1993, as reported to the Division in <br />the Hayden Gulch Mine - /993 Anm~al Report, indicated an improvement in revegetation over the <br />1990 vegetation sampling and overall excellent revegetative success. The 1993 data demonstrated <br />that: <br />• The average percent cover for those areas reclaimed in 1987 was 62% with a litter <br />cover of 35%, which corresponds to a range cover condition rating of 97%. <br />• The 62% average cover for those areas reclaimed in 1987 was greater than the <br />weighted mean for the reference areas (59.7%). <br />• The existing vegetative cover is primarily perennial grasses (herbaceous), with some <br />sagebrush/mountain brush species, and the vegetative community can be classified as <br />dryland pasture or rangeland. <br />3.0 SEDIMENTOLOGY DEMONSTRATION <br />The methodology HGCC utilized in this demonstration incorporated a comparison of the pond invert <br />elevation. A significant increase in the invert elevation would be an indication of sediment <br />accumulation in the pond. HGCC conducted a sediment survey of ponds 001 and 002 during May, <br />1996. The current pond invert elevation for each pond was compared against the as-built pond <br />survey, conducted August, 1992, invert elevation. Figure 2, Ponds 001 and 002 Stage Storage <br />(1992) and Figure 3, Ponds 001 and 002 1996 Sediment Survey and Stage Storage, displays the <br />surveyed configuration and invert elevations for each pond for 1992 and 1996, respectively. The <br />survey datum was utilized to generate stage storage-area curves and available storage capacity <br />volumes for each pond for both years. Table 1, Pond Invert Elevation Comparison, summarizes the <br />pond's invert elevations from the August, 1992 and May, 1996 surveys. <br />File c:\87Tyhax24emovel.dem fi/2B/96 2 <br />