Laserfiche WebLink
Walker to File C-84-065 TR 17 Adequacy Review <br />August 11, 1998 <br />Page 9 of 12 <br />that tl:e office will be more accessible to local residents than the county courthouse.2 The public <br />copy sltal[ be filed at the same time ns the advertisemettt.j <br />' The application is in compliance with this rule. See Rule 2.07.3(2) above. <br />The application is in compliance with this rule. See Rule 2.07.3(2)(c) above. <br />3 The application is in compliance with this rule. See Rule 2.07.3(4)(b) above. <br />Rule 2.08.4(6)(b)(ii): See the Rules for the text of this rule. <br />The application is in compliance with this rule. Comments were received and transmitted to the <br />applicant from the Colorado Historical Society. <br />Rule 2.08.4(6)(b)(iii) (extract): See the Rules for the complete text of this rule. AWithin 60 days <br />after the filing of a complete application for a technical revision, the Division shall issue a <br />proposed decision approving or denying the application in whole or in part. A written copy of <br />such decision shall be promptly provided to the permittee~ and shall be published once in a <br />newspaper of genera[ circulation in the locality of the surface coal mining operation. ~ The <br />applicant or any person with an interest which is or may be adversely affected may request a <br />hearing by the Board.t <br />~ This findings of compliance of the application is a basis for future action by the Division on <br />these items. The Division will issue a proposed decision, shall publish a notice in The Glenwood <br />Posr, and process any request for a hearing. <br />Rule 2.10.1(3) See the Rules for the text of this rule. <br />Item 11 of the midterm review was associated with this rule. The application brings (by a revised <br />Drawing 4.7-4) the PAP into compliance with this rule. <br />Rule 4.0 See the Rules for the text of this rule. <br />Item 6 of the midterm review was associated the table of index for portions of the Permit <br />Application Package associated with this rule. The application did not totally clarify the issue. <br />The applicant was asked to consider re-numbering page 4-vii [o read 4-iii to resolve [he issue by <br />letter of July 3, 2000. By letter of July 31, 2000 that applicant submitted a revised page that <br />brings the PAP into compliance with this rule. <br />Rule 4.03.1(1)(f)(i) See the Rules for the text of [his rule. See Rule 2.05.4(2) above. <br />Rule 4.03.1(4)(d) See the Rules for [he text of this rule. <br />Item 7b of the midterm review was associated with this rule. The application brings (a revised <br />page 4-10) the PAP into compliance with this rule. <br />