My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV00292
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV00292
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:57:59 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:44:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/1/2000
Doc Name
FOIDEL CREEK MINE C-82-056 PERMIT RENEWAL NO 3 ADEQUACY RESPONSE REVIEW
From
DMG
To
TWENTYMILE COAL CO
Type & Sequence
RN3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Twentymile Coal Company revised page 2.05-9 appropriately. <br />21. The Division's January 14, 2000 adequacy letter asked, <br />Revised page 2.05-/79 indicates tha! "mining occurred in 1887 ". 4Ve believe this to be a typo that <br />needs to be corrected. <br />No response was received from Twentymile Coal Company that this error would be corrected. Please <br />submit revised page 2.05-179 to reflect the correct mining date. <br />22.a) , The Division's original question, stated in the Mazch 2, 1998 letter, asked, <br />The discussion of the subsidence of County Road No. 27, on page 2.05-176, states that, <br />"Twentymile Coal Company commits [o provide an as-built certifrcation to Division of Minerals <br />and Ceolo~ upon completion of specified mitigation measures. " Has this certifcation been <br />submitted to the Division? If so, please direct the Division to which exhibit it may be located. <br />Twentymile Coal Company's cover letter, received Febntary 23, 1999, responded to the Division's <br />request with the statement, "The certification will be submitted under separate cover, as Twentymile <br />Coal Company is obtaining another copy from Dr. Breeds." <br />The Division repeated the question in the September 10, 1999 adequacy letter and requested, <br />Twentymile Coal Comparry's letter dared February 23, 1999 indicates that County Road 27 as built <br />certification would be sent under "separate cover. " The Division does not believe this document was <br />sent. Please submit this information. <br />The Division's January 14, 2000 letter asked the question, <br />Twenrymile Coal Company's cover letter dated November 12, 1999 states, "The as-built for the road <br />mitigation work is attached. " There is no indication of which exhibit or figure contairu this as-built. <br />The Division surmised the as-built was submitted as Exhibit 7f-I. Exhibit 7f-1 discusses an "as-built " <br />by Epp and Associates reviewed by Chris Breeds, but no actual "as-built "was submitted Exhibit 7f- <br />I is amodel, not an "as-built" certification. /s this "as-built"submitted elsewhere? Ijso, please <br />sped the location, and if not, please provide the as-built information. <br />Twentymile Coal Company provided the following response in the January 15, 2000 letter, "The <br />submittal of 11/12/99 does go into Exhibit 7f-1. The submittal does certify that it was built in general <br />conformance with the design. Dr. Breeds has been contacted and he will be forwazding a copy of the <br />drawing within a week that can be inserted into the exhibit." <br />As of January 31, 2000, the design drawing has not been submitted to the Division. Please submit a <br />copy of the "as-built" design drawing for the road mitigation work. <br />~22.d) The Division's January 14, 2000 adequacy letter asked, <br />The Division had requested Twentymile Coal Company revise subsidence monitoring discussion of <br />the Eastern Mining District by discussing the district as whole. Page 2.0~-/88 continues to partition <br />C: W H B\C82056\RN03\020100resp.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.