Laserfiche WebLink
<br />STATE iii iiiiiiiiiiiii iii <br />OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Deparlmenl of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman SL, Roam 215 <br />u I v 15 1 0 N O F <br />Dnnver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 1303) A66-3567 MINERAL S <br />FA\: I:i03)A32-A106 & <br /> GEOLOGY <br /> <br />Interoffice MEMORANDUM RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAFETY <br /> Bill Owens <br />to: DMR file, C-81-019 c°`'efn°` <br />from: Byron G. Walker ~ ereg e. warner <br /> <br />subject: Review of Is` Quarter 2001 DMR, C-81-019 E Kecmrve Director <br />Michael R. Lons <br />date: June 11,2001 Drvumn Duecto~ <br />re: Colowyo letter to CDPHE, April b, 2001, Re: DMR Report for Colowyo Coal <br />Company, L.P.; Colorado Waste Water Discharge Permit System Number CO- <br />00045161;Request for Alternate Limits, with at tachments. <br />The l~' Quarter 2001 DMR reports were reviewed. Report entries are consistent with observations <br />taken during CDMG inspections. However, no discharges appeared to be out of compliance during <br />the CDMG inspection but exceedences are reported in the DMR reports. <br />Outfall 001 A (Streeter Pond). This pond was reported as having discharged. Parameters other than <br />total suspended solids were reported as within allowable primary limits. Total suspended solids were <br />reported at 100 milligrams per liter (mg/I), above the permitted 70 mg/l maximum. An average of <br />0.142 MGD was reported (99 gpm). A flow of 54 gpm was observed from the Streeter Pond during <br />the April 18, 2001, 90 gpm during the Mar 21 2001, 157 gpm during the February 20, 2001 and 40 <br />gpm during the December 5, 2000 CDMG inspections. <br />Outfall 002A (Facilities Area Pond). This pond was reported as having no discharge. There was no <br />discharge at the time of the February 20, 2001 CDMG inspection. <br />Outfall 003A (Loadout Pond). This pond was reported as having an average of 13 gpm discharge. <br />There was no observation recorded in the CDMG inspection reports for the period. <br />Outfall 004A (Gulch A Pond). This pond was reported as having no discharge. There was no <br />discharge from this pond at the time of the February 20, 2001 CDMG inspection. <br />Outfall OOSA (Stoker Coal Pond). This pond was reported an average discharge of 13 gpm. It was <br />also reported out of compliance for TSS (120 vs. 70 Max). There was an estimated 20 gpm discharge <br />at [he time of [he February 20, 2001 CDMG inspection (discharge appeazed clear). <br />Outfall 006A (Rail Loop Pond). The average discharge from the pond was reported as 0.168 mgd <br />average discharge (117 gpm or 0.26 cfs), and being out of compliance with TSS, SS, and iron. There <br />was a discharge of 0.4 cfs (179 gpm or 0.26 mgd) at the time of the Febntary 20, 2001 CDMG <br />inspection. The SEDCAD analysis indicates a peak discharge from a ]0-year, 24-hour event from <br />the pond of 0.89 cfs (399 gpm or 0.57mgd). A comparison is as follows: (bold =report, italics = <br />e uivalents) <br />Event Cfs Gage Gpm Mgd <br />CDMG Ins re ort 0.03 03* 0.05 17.9 0.03 <br />DMR re ort 0.26 1 /7 0.168 <br />