My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO30470
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO30470
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:49:11 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:27:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977140
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
12/6/1993
Doc Name
SECOND NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR REVIEW OF MATHIAS CONCRETE NORTH FARM ROAD PIT
From
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS INC
To
MATHIAS CONCRETE INC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • <br />ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. ~~~ <br />700 Florida Avenue <br />Suite 500 <br />Longmont, CO 80.501 <br />(303) 772-5282 <br />Metro (303) 665.6283 <br />FAX (303) 665-6959 <br />December 6, 1993 <br />Mr. Thomas G. Mathias, President <br />Mathias Concrete, Inc. <br />P.O. Box 266 <br />Monte Vista, Colorado Si 144 <br />Re: Second Notice of Need for Additional Information for Review of Mathlas <br />Concrete North Farm Road Pit No. 1 - MLRD Permit M77140 <br />Dear Mr. Mathias: <br />In a letter dated October 22, 1992, the State Engineer recommended that Judy <br />Sappington from his office, Bob Plaska in the Alamosa Division Engineer's Office and <br />myself coordinate to assist you in preparing a plan which can be approved. I apologize <br />for the span of time elapsed since that letter and would like to talk with you about getting <br />your plan moving toward a successful completion again. <br />To refresh your memory, I had sent a letter requesting additional information dated March <br />16, 1992 in which the primary concerns were identified as follows: <br />• Provide documentation of ownership of the replacement water source. <br />• Provide an analysis of the actual historical consumptive use of Rio Grande <br />Canal water used to irrigate the alfalfa. <br />• Take out the well water as a replacement source unless the well is covered <br />by a court approved plan for augmentation. <br />• Credit may be claimed for the area formerly in irrigated alfalfa which is now <br />under the water surface of the lake. <br />• Under current rules and regulations only the depletions from water surface <br />areas exposed after December 31, 1980 need to be replaced. <br />• Provide a description of any other depletive uses of water from the pit. <br />• Provide the potential of sub-irrigation of crops on the historic acreage. <br />CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • PLANNING <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.