PERMFILE72396 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• F! 4 June 18, 1985 Daniel's Pit 2 C. Farrell A. John Bowman and Edward A1cCormick adjacent to Phase IVw which is described J intended for access roads. No extractio fact, nothing will be any different than is no possible effect on this land other minor dust. property - This property is in the amendment as an area ~ will occur in this area. In it has been in the past. There than some noise from trucks and B. Eleanore C. Hoeneke property - The effects on her structures are essentially none. The slope to the west of Ms, Hoeneke's home has been in the condition indicated on the map for about three years and it is nearly completed and ready for reclamation. However, reclamation cannot be instituted on that slope until the large slope above the highway is reduced to a level of about 12 feet above the roadway. The reason for this limitation is that working room in that area is so limited equipment could not efficiently be operated. Once the highway slope is reduced then there will be sufficient room to work on the slope below Ms. Hoeneke's home. No specific date can be provided for doing the reclamation of this slope, but if the amendment is approved this summer then it is anticipated that the slope below her home could be graded and topsoiled in the summer of 1986 and planted by Spring 1987, We also wish to point out that the amendment does not significantly alter the plan or the permit and affected land boundaries in this area from what is contained in the current permit. lJhen the current permit was considered and approved no concern was expressed by Ms. Hoeneke or by the staff of the Mined Land Declamation Board, The section of the law addressing effects on adjacent valuable man-made structures has not changed significantly since the original 1973 act. We seriously wonder why there is a concern over this now when there was no concern previously and the situation on the ground is no different from what it was in the original consideration. C. Fountain Mutual Ditch Company - Daniel's Sand has always worked closely with the ditch company concerning safety to the ditch. In fact, as a shareholder in the ditch, our concern is as great as anybody elses. The ditch company does have easements through the operation and these easements were established with regard to the integrity of the structure. Therefore, this matter of possible impacts have already been taken into account. The ditch company is well aware of what Daniel's Sand is planning and doing and they have expressed no concern over the integrity of their ditch being adversely affected by the operation. We also wish to point out that the possible impacts on the ditch are very little changed over what they were in the original permit consideration. Therefore, our previously expressed concern about why this matter is being addressed now also applies to this aspect.