Laserfiche WebLink
• ~ 15 <br />June 18, '.985 <br />Daniel's Pit 2 <br />C. Farrell <br />We are aware that there is a growing concern about alfalfa and <br />sweetclover. In our experience, the excessive use of these species on <br />areas covered with quality topsoil is patently unwise. But where poor <br />soils are involved or no soil at all, the use of these species appears <br />to be absolutely essential to economically reclaiming land. In spoil, <br />nitrogen fertilizers do not seem to do much good because there is so <br />little organic material to provide a reservoir for the nutrient. Most <br />of the nutrient is lost. As a result, in poor soils as well as spoil, <br />the only viable alternative is to create the soil medium by growing soil <br />building species which includes, most importantly, good nitrogen fixers. <br />There has recently been much work done on nitrogen fixation rates of <br />various native species and it is not at all surprising that most <br />invaders are also excellent nitrogen fixers. Our approach used here is <br />basically drawing upon the clues found in primary successional processes <br />and the nutrient flow pathways in that critical process. <br />Item 7 - Pubescent and Intermediate wheatgrasses will quickly <br />establish and maintain good vigor following seeding. However, I suggest <br />the use of an equally suitable wheatgrass native of the region, e.g., <br />thickspike wheatgrass. This can replace either of the 2 wheatgrasses <br />presented, thereby providing a seedmix more similar to the natural <br />vegetation. Please respond. <br />RESPONSE: We agree that thickspike wheatgrass would be applicable, <br />however, there is a problem with availability and quality. We have <br />considered this species before, but have found it very difficult to find <br />in quantity and the seed quality is rather poor. If in coming years it <br />becomes more available then we will probably use it extensively on this <br />operation as well as on the Castle Concrete operations where it would <br />also have considerable value. But until the sources become more <br />available and the quality becomes better, we feel that replacement of <br />species that we know are easily available and have good quality carries <br />with it a considerable risk of partial failure. If it were to be <br />incorporated, then we would use it as an additional species, but not as <br />a rep]acement for something that we know will work well. <br />Furthermore, the creation of a natural appearing vegetation cover <br />on this site is not one of the goals. The primary goal is the <br />development of a strong vegetation cover. There are many instances <br />where creating a natural appearing vegetation is highly desirable, but <br />on this site where it is surrounded by highly human-centered activities, <br />the extra effort in creating such a growth is highly questionable as to <br />its value. At present, we feel the risks of not acheiving that goal are <br />simply too great if species that are hard to find, of questionable <br />quality, and high cost are used in the mixture. <br />