Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />• <br />Ca e~.# 2 assumes that the diversi.cn is removed and the area abe:/e <br />the reclaimed slope will drain on the reclaimed slope. For this <br />case, a phreatic surface is estimated. The area above the <br />2rntian.=:ment is an east facing slope and. normally develops above <br />average show buildup and gradual snowmel't.. This condition will <br />significantly increase seepage. The estimated phreatic surf ac*_ <br />is shown on the enclosed cross-secticn. The Case # ~ p.^inti~ut <br />spews a factor of safety of 1.t~767 at point (~ii~,7ir96.b7? with a <br />radius of 18~.~ feet. The prcyram stopped when a negative factor <br />of safety was reached at point (~5(r,647ir?. Although the phreatic <br />surface is difficul± to estimate, the results of the two caws <br />show the significant effect of water seeping in the reclaimed <br />slopes. For this reason, we urge that •the diversion 4e lef=. <br />intact tv carry this water away from the reclaimed slopes. <br />/~~~ <br />