My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE72370
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE72370
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:21:58 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:15:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981032
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
CHAPTER M Contd
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SLDF'E STABILITY RlVALYSIS -- fiIENAlJ # 2 MIPJE RACY-:FILLED 5LDAES <br />• Samples of material from the existing mine bench were obtained <br />from the site in late June, 1986. This material will be !tsed as <br />the fill for the portal area. It is comprised of clay, sand, <br />gra•sel and cooly material. This material was submi±ted tc Fv:; <br />and Associates of Colorado far strength testing. The resu'_ts <br />are enclosed. A clay benchfill was also analyzed, however, the <br />amount of this material available for backfilling is not <br />significant. <br />The following parameters are relevant tc the analysis for the <br />fill material: <br />Ma;;imum dry density: i0._.5 lb./c!i. ft. <br />Density used in anal•/sis: 88 lb.fcu. ft. <br />Angle of friction (ma:;?: '0.5 degrees <br />Angle of frictinn in analysis: ~7 degrees <br />Cohesion (max): .°,80 lb./sq. ft. <br />Cohesion used in analysis: 2~0 lb.;sq, ft. <br />The numbers used in the analysis are significantly lever than the <br />lab values because the direct shear tests were performed at 9~:": <br />of the Modified F•roctor Density and only OS% can be e:;pected at <br />slopes of ~H:IV. Also, the lab val!ies are ma::imums, and should <br />be reduced for average fill values. <br />• The REAME program for slope stability analysis developed by 'ra.ng <br />H. Huang of the University of t;entucb:y is used ;n determining the <br />slope safety factors with and without seepage. <br />There are no springs or seeps in the area and it is felt that if <br />the diversion is left intact, virtually no seepage will vcc!;!• <br />because the diversion will carry all snowmelt and rain ~-:noff <br />away from the embankment. The enclosed cross-section shows the <br />backfilled area, the existing slope and the diversion. Sci'_ ? is <br />the fill described above. Soil 1 is the material lying below the <br />fill area. This material has a larger ame!tnt of clay and roc{: <br />and will provide better strength. In'piace density tests <br />performed with a Troxler '411-8 nuclear backacatter have shown an <br />average density of 11~l lb/cu.ft. Estimates of the cohesion and <br />internal angle of friction were made from Table '.1 of Dr. Hua.r:g <br />Stability Analysis of Earth Slopes. <br />Cohesion used in analysis: 300 lbisq. ft. <br />Angle of friction used: ~0 degrees. <br />The enclosed Case # 1 is the case without seepage (ass!;mina :,h•; <br />diversion is left intact.? The minimum factor of safety is 1.61 <br />and occurs at point (<U1.25, 7140._:') with a radius of ~._,?°~ ft. <br />• <br />~/6/~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.