My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO30226
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO30226
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:49:00 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:07:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980002
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
7/18/1984
From
MINCON INC PC
To
FOX CONSULTANTS INC
Permit Index Doc Type
PROF POND CERTIFICATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C <br />MINCON INC., P.C. <br />5504 Jefferson Ave. <br />Denver, Colorado 80237 <br />(303)753-1729 <br />(303) 758-3706 <br />May 28, 1984 <br />~ III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />RECEIVED <br />JUL 18 1984 <br />Mr. George M.L. Robinson <br />Fox Consultants Inc. <br />710 Kipling <br />Lakewood, Colorado 80226 <br />Dear Dir. Robinson: <br />MINED UIND RECLAMA110N DIVISION <br />Colo. Dept of Natural Resources <br />Per our phone conversations during the week of May 14th, Mincon <br />Inc. P.C. is pleased to provide professional services to verify <br />the construction of the sedimentation pond at the O.C. :~o. 2 i,:ine. <br />2ond design criteria has been supplied by Fox Consultants and is <br />based on the Gingery Associates Inc.'s report dated July 16, 1980. <br />On May 21st, a site visit was made by N,r. William Balaz, Mincon, <br />accompanied by Mr. Bob Weaver, O.C. No. 2 Mine Foreman. The <br />dimensions of the constructed pond were measured and compared tc <br />the Gingery Associates' design specifications. The results are: <br />1.) The pond is built in the approximate location on the <br />hillside as shown but may be slightly lower in elevation. <br />This is based on a calculated top of berm elevation of <br />9030 (by altimeter) compared to a design elevation of <br />9139.5• This appears to have been done to facilitate <br />construction by minimizing the cut required and to <br />locate the pond on a flatter slope. <br />2.) The pond is constructed to approximate design dimensions <br />as shown in the Appendix. <br />3.) The pond slopes appear to approximate the required 2s1 <br />and 3:1 grades. Calculations and comments based on field <br />observations are included in the A ppendix. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.