My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE72054
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE72054
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:21:29 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:05:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992081A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/15/2005
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 23 Bonding
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Protluction Shifts. Keeping with current practice locally, one shift per day was used for <br />this estimate. Using one shift per day would allow for preventative maintenance and minor <br />equipment repair to occur on second shift, if needed. Shifts were based on an eight-hour <br />period per shift and a aeries of job condition correction Pactors were built into the <br />production estimate. <br />Equipment Types. The types of equipment selected were based on similar type equipment <br />presently operating in or around Routt County. whenever possible, Caterpillar equipment <br />was used for reclamation due to widely published information re gardinq costs and <br />performance. All equipment costs were taken from those provided by CDMG. Please see <br />appropriate worksheets in Attachment 23-1 for a list of all cost factors. Equipment <br />performance was based on Caterpillar Handbook No. 29, or otherwise as noted. <br />Equipment and operator performance factors were based on generally published and accepted <br />criteria (see individual worksheetsl. <br />Operator wages were all based on information supplied by CDMG. <br />Reclamation Time Frame. A reasonable time frame for a job of this magnitude is estimated <br />at approximately two months fox backfilling, grading, and topsoiling. The support <br />equipment needed for the fleet size and time frame could then be estimated. Mechanic <br />labor rates were included in the lobe truck cost. <br />Mobilization antl Demobilization Costs. Mobilization and demobilization costs were based <br />on mobilizing the major pieces of equipment from Craig, Colorado. CIRCES Coet Estimating <br />Software was used to calculate the mobilization and demobilization costa for initial <br />reclamation, pond removal and site maintenance. <br />Indirect Costs <br />The following is an estimate of indirect costs associated with the reclamation of the <br />Hayden Gulch Loadout. <br />Contractor Profit and Overhead <br />Profit and overhead for the contractor was estimated using Graph 2, OSMRE Reclamation Bond <br />Handbook. This was estimated at 10 percent of the direct costs. <br />TR-06 5 Revised OS/05 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.