Laserfiche WebLink
~ ! III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />December 18, 1979 <br />2tr. Don Kriz <br />Ptountain Mobile tfix, Inc. <br />Eox 517 <br />Frisco, Colorado 80443 <br />P.P: Chambers Pit <br />Our file G79-205 <br />Dear "Ir. Kriz: <br />I have reviewed your application for conversion of your 110 (limited impact) <br />permit on your "Rifle Pit" to a 112 (regular) permit, now to be called the <br />"Chambers Pit." I have several comments on the adequacy of the application <br />as relates to possible approval by the Pained Land Reclamation Board. I hope <br />these comments will be helpful to you. <br />First of all, relating to item 13 on the application forma the acreage of <br />affected land seems to be too low. For example, if the Chambers Pit acreage <br />is ten acres, it ~rhould be added to the nine original acres of the Rifle Pit, <br />giving a total of nineteen acres, and an additional fee of $135.00. <br />The remaining comments will be made on an exhibit by exhibit basis. F.xliibits <br />not mentioned are considered to be adequate at this time. <br />Exhibit C: Referring to Rule 2.12, Bxhibit C, this map should portray the <br />following: <br />1. All immediately adjacent surface owners of record. <br />2. The existing topography of the area with contour lines of sufficient <br />detail to portray the direction and rate of slope of the affected land. <br />In this regard, a topographic map would be better than an aerial <br />photograph. <br />3. The total area to be involved in the operation (including all of <br />the original rifle Pit). <br />4. The type of persistent vegetation (where it exists) covering the <br />affected lands. <br />5. Additional water informations .including tributary water courses, <br />wells, springs, etockwater ponds, reservoirs and ditches on the affected <br />land (Reference Rule 2.12 (7) b (i) ). <br />