My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO29779
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO29779
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:48:40 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:28:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
2/23/2005
Doc Name
Edwards Mine Portal Spring-Analysis Results and Plan (Memo)
From
Jim Stark
To
Joe Dudash
Permit Index Doc Type
Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
possibility that the coloration of the water coming from the Edwards Mine Portal spring <br />is due to humic acids (which, in turn, are coming from the Leonardite shale). <br />One final area that cannot be overlooked in any analysis of the Edwards Mine Portal <br />spring water quality issue is the fact that similar appearing water is seen at the Bowie <br />No.2 Mine. The water has not yet been tested but it is curious that similarly colored <br />water would appear hundreds of feet higher and several miles away from the Bear No. 3 <br />Mine. After testing and comparison of the Bowie No. 2 water with the Edwards Mine <br />Portal discharge, the possibility that the water is coming from contamination that resulted <br />from the water being in contact with the Bear No.3 Mine (or some "item" in the Bear No. <br />3 Mine) can be determined. <br />The strong possibility of humic acids compels the Division to do additional analyses to <br />confirm or refute their presence. What I propose is three (and possibly a forth) different <br />levels of analyses. The first thing that needs to be done is that two sets of samples should <br />be taken from both the Edwards Mine Portal spring (or as close as is safely possible, <br />given weather conditions and the fact that the spring originates in a slide area) and the <br />Bowie No. 2 Mine seep. One of these sample sets, along with a trip blank, should be sent <br />to Colorado State University (CSU) and the other set, along with a trip blank, should be <br />sent back to the Division. <br />The main analyses would be conducted at CSU. The university has the capability to <br />identify high molecular weight organic molecules. Based on the results of the analyses, <br />there could be a determination if, in fact, humic acids are present. The cost for each <br />sample to be analyzed is $50.00. The second set of analyses would be performed by the <br />Division. Purification of humic acids is performed by industry in a simple, two-step <br />extraction procedure using sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid. This extraction <br />could be performed with relative ease (and probably no cost) by Division personnel. This <br />extraction technique would be indicative of the presence of humic acids. The <br />concentration of humic acids in the water could then be roughly calculated. The third set <br />of analyses would be performed by the CDPHE lab. They would perform a Total <br />Organic Carbon (TOC) analysis on the water sample and on the above extracted humic <br />acids to determine carbon concentrations. This could be used to calculate the <br />concentration of humic acids in the solution as well as to determine whether the <br />substance that was extracted is actually humic acids. A forth set of analyses by the <br />CDPHE lab may be useful. One more set of total metals analyses (on the metals with <br />positive results) as well as a set of metals analyses on a filtered sample (for dissolved <br />metals) may provide some useful information as well (considering humic acids are good <br />at removing metals from water). <br />Based on the lab results and a search of pertinent literature, it is my belief that the <br />substance causing the brown color in the Edwards Mine Portal spring is humic acids. I <br />also believe that if the Division performs the above-mentioned analyses, their results, <br />along with the literature, could provide a definitive (or as definitive as possible) answer <br />as to what is causing the brown coloration of the Edwards Mine Portal spring. This <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.