My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO29779
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO29779
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:48:40 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:28:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
2/23/2005
Doc Name
Edwards Mine Portal Spring-Analysis Results and Plan (Memo)
From
Jim Stark
To
Joe Dudash
Permit Index Doc Type
Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
evident in the water quality data presented above. If there was AMD, the sulfate <br />concentration would be in the parts-per-thousand, rather than the parts-per-million (ppm <br />or mg/L) as observed. Additionally, there would be metal concentrations in the hundreds <br />of ppm rather than the low (1-4) ppm and the parts-per-billion (ppb or ug/L) seen in the <br />data. There would also (most likely) be the telltale "yellow-boy", which is the iron <br />staining of the rocks that is observed with AMD. There would be no vegetation in the <br />area either, as it would not be able to withstand the acidic conditions and/or the extremely <br />high metals concentrations. <br />Humic acids are long carbon chain molecules with atomic weights ranging from <br />approximately 700 Daltons up to approximately 100,000 Daltons~ (a Dalton is one atomic <br />mass unit or AMU, corresponding to the weight of one proton or one neutron). Among <br />other things, they aze used as an amendment for agricultural soils2, for cleaning up waste <br />streams for superfund sites3 and are a major source of buffering capacity for lakes and <br />streams3. While humic acids and their uses have been and continue to be extensively <br />studied, it has been more from the standpoint of "how can they be used" and "what <br />benefits do they impart". Their structures and overall chemistries are very complex and, <br />as such, very little information in those areas exists. <br />The reason that there is a strong possibility that the coloration from the Edwards Mine <br />Portal spring is from humic acids lies in their origins and the nature of these molecules <br />and the circumstantial evidence from the available literature. Humic acids are precursors <br />of petroleum and coal4 and are found and mined in areas that are either used for or <br />associated with coal mining. Finally, "dissolved humic substances, the main constituents <br />of the dissolved organic carbon pool in surface water... commonly impart ayellowish- <br />brown color to the water systemi5. <br />The basic process for the formation of humic acid is that vegetation was laid down during <br />the Carboniferous Period and subsequently underwent heating and compaction. This <br />compaction squeezed out the organic acids present in the vegetation and they formed a <br />pool on the top of the bed. Over time the pool dried and aged and eventually formed <br />Leonardite shaleb (this was happening simultaneously with the compaction of the lower <br />organic layer which formed the coal reserves). <br />It is the final statements of the above two paragraphs that make the most compelling case <br />for the Edwards Mine Portal spring. The fact that the water coming from the spring is a <br />yellowish-brown and the fact that the main source of humic acids is from Leonardite <br />shale is very compelling. A review of the geology portion of the Bear No. 3 Mine permit <br />(Section 2.04.6, pages 2.04-12 through 2.04-29) states that both the overburden and the <br />underburden for the B and C seams is shale. The permit also states that portions of both <br />the floors and the roofs of the mine were exposed at various times during mining, as they <br />were determined to be of competent material. The drill logs confirrn this and also show <br />layers of interbedded shale throughout. Since the Leonardite shale is consistent with <br />other shales, it would have only been identified by the driller as "shale". Also, given that <br />Leonardite shale is formed in conjunction with coal formation, there is a very strong <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.