Laserfiche WebLink
SEDIMENT CONTROL <br />1. Bush Draw (2.05.3(3)(c)) <br />Wyoming Fuel Company (WF) has provided a design for anew culvert to be in- <br />stalled at the Bush Draw crossing. The design technique uses the Manning's <br />equation to determine an acceptable culvert diameter. Manning's equation was <br />developed for steady, uniform, open channel flow. while flow through culverts <br />sometimes approximates open channel flow, the contraction of flow at the inlet <br />makes use of Manning's equation inappropriate for design of culverts. <br />Charts for determining culvert headwater are available from several sources. <br />Enclosed is a copy of Chart 5 from Hydraulic Charts for the Selection of High_ <br />w~ Culverts, U.S. Department of Transportation, December, 1965. This chart <br />is for inlet controlled culverts which is generally the case with short highway <br />culvert installations. Entering this chart using the peak flow estimate <br />generated by WF of 70 cfs results in a NW/D ratio of approximately 2.5. This <br />indicates that an embankment height from the base of the culvert inlet to the <br />road surface would need to be about eight feet. <br />The estimated peak flow (70 cfs) appears to be excessive. While the range <br />condition of Bush Draw is very likely "poor", the predominant sage-grass <br />vegetative community presents a fairly dense protective cover and hydrologically <br />probably qualifies as "good". Estimating the percent ground cover at 300, <br />a CN of 74 is generated by Figure S-3, page 23 of Peak Flows in Colorado, SCS <br />1980. Using a CN of 74 results in a peak flow estimate of approximately 2I cfs. <br />Entering Chart 5 with 21 cfs shows no head above the culvert inlet in a 36" <br />culvert and a headwater of approximately 1. 7D or 3.4' of headwater in the <br />existing installation. <br />Wyoming Fuel Company must use some form of closed conduit hydraulics to design <br />culverts. The proferred chart is a simple and acceptable method. Wyoming <br />Fuel may wish to consider revising their peak flow estimate using a more <br />realistic curve number. <br />2. Mine Onerati ons Area <br />The response by WF is not complete: The purpose and design of the ditch which <br />runs on the West side of the coal stockpile is not given. The Division realizes <br />that water will continue to reach pond b1 throughout reclamation efforts in the <br />pit 1 area. However, it is important that a ditch be maintained in order to <br />prevent the collected eaater from coursing through the reclaimed surface, causing <br />serious erosion problems. <br />2B. Culvert Crossing Haul Road Near the Sho <br />Using a peak flow of 3.9 cfs and entering the culvert headwater chart, Chart <br />5, a substantial headwater is needed to pass the flow through the culvert. <br />WF may either provide a riprap protected embankment 2' in height or choose a <br />larger culvert. As the road is a haul road, a foot of fill above the culvert <br />would appear to be reasonable and would provide sufficient depth for the <br />development of a 2' headwater. <br />