Laserfiche WebLink
.,. ~~ c.~ <br />UNi"i cU STATES D.PART:~IFNT OF AGRICULI'UtiE <br />FOt2 E'~T S~:RVICE <br />~• RG~r• <br />FtPt.v ro: 2510 dining Claims March 31, 1977 <br />Sus~ECr. Homestake Water Treatment Plant 'y`` <br />ii ~c'f <br />Project }+o. 0400 ~' ~'~ <br />t U'1S <br />1 ~ L. <br />ro: Creede District Fanger ~`~ <br />~~~. <br />Ilomestake's proposal to locate its water treatment plant near the <br />portal poses no serious soil or water problems. Either a buried culvert <br />or one exposed on the surface of the proposed fill, as discussed, will <br />work suitably. however, we si~ould reyuire that the outfall of any <br />culvert be designed so that excess energy of exiy~ting waters will be <br />dissipated adequately to prevent scouring. This can be accomplished <br />with a small rock-lined pool or even a pile of rocks. <br />It would also be good for Homestake <br />will support vegetation, but only as <br />erosion problems ate not likely. <br />to seed any cut and fill slopes that <br />funds permit. For the most part, <br />C• As we discussed Tuesday, the .location of the waste treatment facility <br />would have least visual impact if it were located adjacent to the point <br />of discharge. The building color should be tones such as dark green or <br />brown caith a flat nonreflective finish. A visual screen of plant <br />materials is recommended if the finished grade on cahich the waste treatment <br />facility will stand is equal to or Higher than the existing grade of the <br />waste pilings. <br />TERRY DANGLER <br />Landsca <br />pz Architect <br />/ <br /> <br />v JOHN J. }TILL ;;;;~ <br />Hydrologist '• G%`''..~d° D,J D <br />G~" cC~l~'L <br /> r„ ~.; <br />.. ~ ,~; <br /> .1 <br />;`~~' '~ ~ , <br />1G`R <br />.. ~ <br />n <br /> <br />. , <br />, <br />,~^ <br />///~ <br />/~~.. ~ 4 r ^ .. <br />} <br /> l- '. <br />"~• <br /> <br /> • ~ Fn`IS <br />-- - ~ ~,ec`,c <br />_ , *•o~. <br /> <br /> - 171 - <br />