My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE69721
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE69721
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:18:48 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:00:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000158
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/30/2001
Doc Name
Response to SCD Concerns
From
ENVIRONMENT INC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• . iii iimuimiuii <br />Egviroqr~er~t, Iqc. <br />LARRY E. O'BRIAN <br />FOUNDER <br />March 30, 2001 <br />Ms. Erica Crosby <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman St., #215 <br />Denver, CO 80215 <br />Dear Erica; <br />RE: Platte Sand & Gravel LLC <br />S&H Mine, Permit # M-2000-158 <br />7985 VANCE DRIVE, SUITE 205A <br />ARVADA, COLORADO 80003 <br />303-423-7297 <br />FAX 303-423-7599 <br />RECEIVED <br />MAR 3 0 2001 <br />DiYisian of Minerals and Geology <br />This will serve to address the letter the Division received on <br />March 19, 2001 from the Platte Valley SCD. I note that the <br />Division received the document nearly 33 days after the public <br />comment period ended. If my memory serves me right, the Platte <br />Valley SCD was advised in a notice they received on December 23, <br />2000 that they had the same comment period as everyone else and <br />still failed to follow the rules. I feel it is very important to <br />make sure all interested parties follow the rules laid out in the <br />law, even the SCD. Since they do not appear on the "PARTY TO THE <br />CASE" list their comments would not be addressed, normally. <br />Platte Sand & Gravel LLC has asked me to respond to this as a <br />courtesy to the local SCD office, but I feel the above comments had <br />to be made to keep the record straight. After reading their <br />comments I find that many of the items would have been very useful <br />when I was preparing the permit. I have accepted some of their <br />suggestions and made some of the corrections they pointed out. <br />On behalf of our client Platte Sand & Gravel LLC (PS&G), I <br />will respond to the Platte Valley SCD letter in the order pre- <br />sented. We wish to thank the SCD Board for the time they took to <br />review the permit. <br />Soils/limitation. - This is not a Division of Minerals and Geology issue. <br />It would be addressed if there were engineered foundations for <br />permanent structures on the site. <br />For Septic - The same soils data was presented by the NRCS in their <br />report and this information is repetitive. Prior to building a <br />septic system for this facility PS&G will have to have it designed <br />and approved by the Weld County Health Dept. The engineers hired <br />to design a septic system will have to take into account the soils <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.