Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />L. <br />~~ <br /> <br />again anorder-of-magnitude lower, similar to other previous sampling events, and that there must have <br />been a clerical error in the May 2000 results. <br />When comparing the field conductivity values with the TDS (Total Dissolved Solids) from the <br />laboratory analysis, it appears that the TDS values are higher than expected. TDS values can typically <br />be estimated by multiplying the held conductivity value by a factor of 0.75-0.8. For example, the May <br />21, 2001 analysis for MW-7 had a field conductivity value of 3180. Using a factor of 0.75, one would <br />expect the TDS value to be about 2385 mg/L. The TDS value reported by the laboratory was 3240 <br />mg/L. This suggests that some material may have dissolved in the sample bottles prior to analysis. <br />Conclusions <br />It does not appear that the ground water in the vicinity of the Holnam quarry has been impacted by the <br />CKD landfilled in the quarry. Water levels in the vicinity of the CKD landfills are below the bottom of <br />the CKD and fluctuate very little. It does not appear that any ground water has come in contact with <br />the CICD. <br />If you have any questions or would like additional information please call. <br />' Respectfully Submitted, <br />K-S & Company, Inc. <br />~~ ~' _ _ - <br />Ronald J. Turnery R.G. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Project Manager <br />cc: Violet Sykora <br />Paul Detterline <br />Alyce Johnson <br />Ground Water Mooi[oriug 5 Copyright 2001 <br />Aogust6,2001 K-S & Company.lnc. <br /> <br />