My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE68702
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE68702
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:14:16 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:29:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 9B ARCHAEOLOGY APPENDIX Part 2 of 4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SDCfICN III <br />• PFDSLEM DOPF~iN.S AMID RESEAFC~I RATIONALE <br />Prehistoric Context <br />The project area is located near the contact between the Colorado <br />Plateau and the Southern Rocky Mrnmtain gearorphic Provinces. <br />Archaeologists generally discuss these areas as separate entities but <br />they are very closely related and are probably, at least on the west <br />central edge of the Southern Rockies, part of the same cultural area, <br />namely the Great Hasin. This was apparent to history when the Utes were <br />shown to have roamed both the mountains of the Gunnison Country and the <br />plateaus of the Colorado Plateau Province to the West (Calloway, <br />Janetski and Stewart 1986:337). <br />As recently as the late 1970's, however, the mounta;m,a regions of <br />the Gunnison Country were virtually unexplored on both the prehistoric <br />and historic archaeological levels. There was far more known about its <br />100 year old Euro-American history than about its suspected 10,000 or <br />more year old aboriginal prehistory. The few published articles on the <br />region pointed out the main thetas of agriculture and mining for the <br />only substantive white settlement since removal of the Ute Indians. In <br />regard to prehistory, general published professional opinions had to <br />that time stressed that the harsh winters almost certainly preclwded any <br />form of aboriginal occupation other than transient and seasonal ones <br />• such as for hunting, raw material procurement, and transportation <br />through the mountains (Schroeder 1953; Lister 1962). 7Yus view of the <br />(~nnison Country was similar to that held by the professional <br />archaeological oa~muiity in general in regard to the major alpine <br />portions of Colorado. In essence, the nountain areas had not been <br />considered as part of any one major culture area such as the Anasazi or <br />Plains areas. Rather, they were viewed as marginal environments subject <br />to cultural forces fran several directions. Various aboriginal peoples <br />from other culture areas were thought to have tapped the mountain <br />resources on a seasonal basis or briefly passed through them on their <br />way fran one area to another (Tate, n.d.; Rippeteau 1978:6; Sigstad <br />1977). <br />Since the late 1970's archaeological knowledge of the mountain <br />areas of the (tuuuson Country has been expanded due to various cultural <br />resource management projects (Baker 1980 and see Guthrie et a1:1964). <br />Even with the greatly increased data base, it is still not possible to <br />scientifically resolve the generalized questions and assumptions held in <br />the late 1970's. Even the issue of seasonality of occupation in the <br />mountains has not been resolved as discussed by Black (1980). <br />In fact, there is essentially no direct evidence one way or <br />another as to the possible seasonality of aboriginal <br />exploitation of the high irow,taiu~ areas prior to the arrival <br />of Anylo-American settlers. Archaeologically, neither <br />Centuries Research's hbw~t }]mions Prclect i;rvestigatioi~s nor <br />• <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.