My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-03-15_PERMIT FILE - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2000-03-15_PERMIT FILE - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2021 12:05:20 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:17:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/15/2000
Doc Name
1999 Annual Hydrologic Report
Annual Report Year
1999
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix W 1999 Report Section 2.5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br /> The water-level changes for the HI aquifer have generally been influenced less by <br /> slightly less than average recharge during the last two years. The mining upgradient of HI <br /> wells GB-5 and GF-4, which occurred several years ago, has been long enough in the past <br /> to allow water to fully recover. The water levels in these HI aquifer wells seem to be <br /> varying only slightly with changes in recharge rates. Water levels are not likely to ever <br /> recover to their pre-mine level in well GB-5. The elevation of the backfill springs likely <br /> limits the head buildup in the backfill aquifer, which, in turn, limits the maximum head in <br /> the downgradient coal aquifer. Similar water-level responses are being observed in the <br /> two backfill equivalent HI aquifer wells GF-5 and GF-7. Water levels seem to have reached <br /> recovered levels in these two wells. The development of backfill springs may limit the <br /> maximum water level in some of these areas of the A pit. <br /> The water levels in the three GE wells stabilized in approximately 1990. This is • <br /> thought to be due to the length of time since dewatering stopped at the adjacent <br /> underground operation. The additional water-level rise in the last five years in wells GE-1 <br /> and GE-2 is likely due to increased recharge and some additional recovery from mine <br /> dewatering. <br /> Water levels in the backfill areas are depressed and are not likely to ever recover to <br /> pre-mine levels except near the northern end of the mine area. Map 2-1 shows that the <br /> levels in the backfill and downgradient aquifers are similar. Well pairs GD-3 & GD-2 and <br /> GF-11 & GF-6 present water levels that are very similar in water-level elevation for the <br /> backfill and downgradient QR aquifer well. Mining is significantly increasing the <br /> permeability of the backfill aquifers which is a benefit relative to potential yields from the <br /> aquifer. The increased permeability will likely not allow water levels to recover to pre-mine •\ <br /> 6-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.