My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-03-15_PERMIT FILE - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2000-03-15_PERMIT FILE - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2021 12:05:20 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:17:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/15/2000
Doc Name
1999 Annual Hydrologic Report
Annual Report Year
1999
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix W 1999 Report Section 2.5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6.0 OBSERVED IMPACTS ON THE HYDROLOGIC SYSTEMS <br /> OF THE TRAPPER MINE <br /> 6.1 GROUND WATER <br /> Water-level changes in the last few years for the QR aquifer are mainly due to <br /> natural variations in the recharge rate. Water-level changes were observed in QR aquifer <br /> wells GD-2 and GF-6, along with associated backfill wells GD-3 and GF-11. Wells GD-2 and <br /> GF-6 are fairly close to mined areas but the 1999 gradual water-level decline observed in <br /> these four wells is mainly due to a decline in recharge. The increased recharge due to <br /> higher precipitation over the prior years had caused water-level increases and gradual <br /> water-level declines have occurred with the lower precipitation rates the last two years. <br /> These wells are located near the downgradient toes of D and E pits and/or at the interface <br /> of upgradient backfill and the downgradient native QR aquifer. These well locations seem <br /> -• to be relating to changes in precipitation with very little lag in time. <br /> Upgradient mining can cause water-level rises in wells downgradient of the mining <br /> by allowing ground water to flow to the downgradient end of mining quicker. Also, the <br /> backfill aquifers are generally more permeable than the native aquifer which also allows <br /> ground water to flow faster through the backfill material resulting in more water in the <br /> aquifer at this location. The input of additional water to the native aquifer at the north end <br /> (toe) of the mining has decreased the effects mine dewatering has had on water levels in <br /> this portion of the aquifer. Water levels in wells GD-2, GD-3, GF-6 and GF-11 are thought <br /> to be at or above the baseline levels for this reason. The slightly higher water levels in <br /> well GD-2 in 1998 than those observed in 1986 after six wet years indicates the post-mine <br /> levels under the same conditions may be higher. Springs are not expected to develop at <br /> • the north end of the D and F pits. <br /> 6-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.