Laserfiche WebLink
<br />precautions and corrective actions undertaken and planned by CC&V, and a written report <br />satisfying Rule 8.2.3. Corrective actions will include a specific plan of corrective action to be <br />timely implemented to control, reduce, or otherwise minimize movement of leach solution in <br />harmful quantities moving outside the permit area. Though any such circumstance will <br />necessitate case-specific measures, CC&V will address testing of areas through manipulation of <br />leach solution application. [?At any time when redeployment of applied water has not mitigated <br />the migration of leach fluid from the pad to the environment, CC&V will cease addition of <br />additional water to the pad.?] <br />d. The results of laboratory analyses for the listed pazameters will be provided to the OMLR <br />along with the sampling locations, date and time of sampling, type of analyses, and applicable <br />laboratory sample number. <br />e. In the event the concentrations of criterion parameters in water removed from the sumps <br />exceed the concentrations listed on Table 2, the water removed for measurements will be <br />returned to the pad (because the volume is infinitesimally small compared to the total capacity <br />of the pond). <br />TABLE 2 - 30-day Average Threshold Concentrations (a minimum of 4 measurements <br />are required to constitute a 30-day average concentration) and Flow Criterion -LDS <br />PARAMETER PHASE I OF PAD PHASE II OF PAD <br />CNWAp 5.0 mgll not yet established <br />pH 9.0 s.u. 9.0 s.u. <br />Flow Consistent and independent <br />of precipitation events Consistent and independent <br />of precipitation events <br />~lanatory Note: <br />It is believed that if CNWAp and pH increase to threshold concentrations in the underdrain <br />system, the concentrations in one or more of the LDSs should also show a rise in CNWAp and <br />pH and a relatively continuous flow should emanate into the same one or more of the LDS <br />sumps independent of precipitation. <br />A flow criterion other than that of a relatively continuous flow independent of precipitation from <br />the LDS does not seem to apply in the case of the Cresson Valley Leach facility because (1) the <br />prposed (to date) flow criterion for the underdrain system would be so small as to be exceeded <br />by the flows already experienced and (2} the flow rate from the LDS is not measurable on a gpm <br />basis and if it were, the criterion would likewise be exceeded by historic data and therefore <br />obscured by the volumes pumped that have already been documented as resulting from <br />precipitation outside the pad. <br />Ground-Water Monitoring Wells: If the CNWAO and pH in the LDS exceeds the criterion <br />4 <br />