Laserfiche WebLink
<br />precautions and corrective actions undertaken and planned by CC&V, and a written report <br />satisfying Rule 8.2.3. Corrective actions will include a specific plan of corrective action to be <br />timely implemented to control, reduce, or otherwise mi 'mike movement of ea h soluC t i <br />harmful quantities moving outside the permit area. ~`~`°~ suc rcum taun w~~ <br />necessitate case-speci ~c measures, CC&V will address t=sting of eas throw manipulat' n of S~~thud <br />leach solution applic lion. [?At any tim~when redeployment of plied wat r has not m' igated cu,~1~„~t <br />the migration of 1 h fluid from the ad to the environment, CC&V wi cease ad lion of °~ s+a~ <br />additional water to t e pad.?] ~~ <br />Q~el^~ <br />d. The'Yesults of laboratory analyses for the listed parameters will be provided to the OMLR <br />along with the sampling locations, date and time of sampling, type of analyses, and applicable <br />labotatory sample number. ~kdu.~'-~ t-S <br />e. In the event the concentrations of criterion parameters in water removed from theAsumps <br />exceed the concentrations listed on Table 2, the water removed for measurements will be <br />returned to the pad (because the volume is infinitesimally small compared to the total capacity <br />of the pond). A d~ ac-c.e~w~ a(, -1~ Vat.A.n.~ ~nv,n ~ ~ N-1'tu~~ °'~ du~9~ banxA <br />9'• ufn~ ice- ~v.SUG.rn .i:,o t ,st~rcrJ, ' ~ <br />TABLE 2 - 30-day Average Threshold Concentrations (a minimum of 4 measurements <br />are required to constitute a 30-day average concentration) and Flow Criterion -LDS <br />PARAMETER PHASE I OF PAD PHASE II OF PAD <br />CNW,,p -3-:9-mgH •S'w~9 ~ L aeE-ye emstaHlrshed <br />pH 9.0 s.u. 9.0 s.u. <br />Flow Consistent and independent <br />of precipitation events Consistent and independent <br />of precipitation events <br />Explanatory Note: <br />It is believed that if CNW„p and pH increase to threshold concentrations in the underdrain <br />system, the concentrations in one or more of the LDSs should also show a rise in CNWAp and <br />pH and a relatively continuous flo should emanate int the same one or more of the LDS <br />sumps independent of precipitation 'rlp-r c~luc.+~ ii a~t.(zw~+-~, {~-~ Svw~-1b1~ <br />IrbS s~~no..t. ~A -`-~ ~ Q~~Y.n~.~eu,,,iv~.,~.'~i'q*~-~u~.X.~~Pa~ <br />A flow criterion other than that of a relatively continuous flow independent of precipitation from ~,y~ <br />the LDS does not seem to apply in the case of the Cresson Valley Leach facility because (1) the CeTY1R-(s~' <br />prposed (to date) flow criterion for the underdrain system would be so small as to be exceeded <br />by the flows already experienced and (2) the Flow rate from the LDS is not measurable on a gpm <br />basis and if it were, the criterion would likewise be exceeded by historic data and therefore <br />obscured by the volumes pumped that have already been documented as resulting from <br />precipitation outside the pad. <br />Ground-Water Monitoring Wells: If the CNwAp and pH in the LDS exceeds the criterion <br />4 <br />