My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO28691
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO28691
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:47:50 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:44:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977424
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
8/5/1994
Doc Name
PUBLIC NOTICE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COLORADO DEPAR77~fENT OF 1 • , Water Quality Control Division • <br />Rationale -Page 3, Permit No. CO-0029947 <br />1 2. Ouahtuy. Acute and Chronic Low Flaws - The flows which are typically used to ca~ulare acute and chronic <br />efjlucnt limitations are the one day in three year low flow (lE3J and the 30 day in three year low flow (30E3J, <br />respectively. However, those flows have not been determined for either Logan Wash or Roan Creek by the Water <br />Qualty Control Division. Therefore, the Division has derided to utilize the Qxro chronic low flow for Logan Wash <br />from rlu previous permit. This flow was selected by Best Professional Judgrnunt as an estimation of the 30E3 <br />(chronic) and the IE3 (acute) low flows since there are ro critical water quality standardbastd limier for slur <br />permit that are q~icttd by the stream low flow value. Additionally. due to the ephemeral nature of Logan Wash, <br />6oth!the IE3 and 30E3 would also likely be 0.0 cfs. However, if future permit Umitr or water quality standards <br />are changed, then the stream low flow values may need to be rtdettrnrined. 7hc stream !ow flows are as follows <br />(all flows in cubic fed per second!: <br />Table Ill - I - Chrome Low Flaw <br />,... <br />Annual 0.0 0.0 <br />IV. FAC/L%TY DESCRIPTION <br />A. Industry Description <br />The jaciUty is a research and development sire for the ecperimaual production of oil (kerogenJ from oil shale. <br />Original plans called for production of 1,000 borreis per day of oil with associated process waters to be mechanically <br />treated pear to discharge. However, due to economic reason, oil shale has never bete produced nor as expected to <br />be pr~uced at the site any time in the near future. Therefore, the entire mine site currently remains idle m a <br />maintenance only made. More derailed drscriptions of the mine site and its original operation plan are included in <br />the 1983 and 1986 pmnrt rationales. <br />7tvo outfalis exist at the facility, OutfaU 001 is a mint dewntenng discharge located directly upstream from the <br />oil/water separator and Outfall 002 is a mint dewntcring discha-ge from the portal of the Research mint adrt. Flow <br />is monitored at Outfall 001 by a bucks acrd stopw>ztch and at Ou{raU 002 by a parshall flumes (.k~cidental, Inc. <br />representatives stated that historically, OutfaU 002 has been the only outfaU with reported discharges primarily because <br />the designated outfaU structure is located directly at the portal of the adit. 7lterefore, when inter is present, reported <br />discharges occur. Conversely, the designated outfall structure for Gbl is located directly within Logan Wash some <br />distance beneath the actual drainage hole. Therefore, altiwugh present, mine drainage typically percolates into the <br />ground and rarely, rf ever, reaches the designated outfaU structure for Outfall 00I which redacts and/or eliminates <br />actual discharger. Discharges correlate with periods of snow melt and wet weather with most discharges oocurring <br />in the spring and summer months. Discharges from Outfall 002 occurred from May to November in 1993 and from <br />April to May in 1994. Prior to 1993, neither outfaU had discharged for numerous years. <br />Process iwnter is generated when soon activities are occurring, however, retort process waters art not allowed to be <br />discharged through OutfaUs 001 or 002 at any time and art instead be directed to the evaporation ponds discussed <br />below. ~7he facility conducted eight retorts m the mid 1980's but ro additional retorts have been conducted since. <br />Prior to' 1991, EMRs Corporation was contracted to perform all on-site management of the Logan Wash mine site. <br />Since rh'at trine, Dames Qc Moore has been contracted by Occidental, Inc. ro conduct the routine maintenance and <br />perform the required environmental monitoring. A crew from Dames & Moor's Rife, Colorado, office visits the site <br />on a weekly basis to check the outfaUs for discharges, leakage of the evaporation ponds, and for basic security <br />reasons. There rs rro on-srte staff presem at the mrne site and the only remaining structures are the adrt, the outfal! <br />structures, and the retort equipment and associated oil/water separator, piping system, evaporation ponds and leak <br />collection system. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.