My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO28602
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO28602
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:47:47 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:38:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
7/5/2007
Doc Name
Groundwater Points of Compliance
From
J.E. Stover & Associates Inc
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Ground Water
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and well development costs there is little or no possibility the aquifers below the mine <br />area will support future alternative land uses. This is because the costs to drill and <br />produce water from aquifers on BLM and USDA-FS managed lands will exceed 300 feet <br />in depth, will be costly, the water quality poor (Bowie Permit Documents-12/I 1/2001) <br />(total dissolved solids (TDS) levels could exceed 5,000 mg/1), and well production rates <br />will likely be less than 10 gallons per minute and fransmissivities are equal to or less than <br />1750 gallons per day per foot. (Colorado Westmoreland, Inc. 1982) and where Wright <br />Water Engineers tested a well in March of 1979 where the sustain yields would be less <br />than one gallon a minute. (Wright Water Engineers, Correspondence to Jack Cline <br />Colorado Westmoreland, 1979). Table 1 summarizes groundwater mine production <br />where the total water yield from the underground operation ranges from 7 to 50 gallons <br />per minute (gpm) and annually averaging less than 30 gpm. <br />4.2 Geological Setting <br />Coal is mined from the Mesaverde Formation. Geologic offset where the cover over the <br />coal can range from zero at the outcrop to over 1,000 feet deep. The strike of the coal <br />beds is north 70 degrees west (290 degrees) with a dip of 3 degrees to the northeast. Coal <br />units within this formation can be highly faulted. The geology (Figure 1), geologic <br />structure and sttatigraphic sections (Figure 2 and 3) suggest the amount of transverse <br />faulting appears to be increasing with depth. Figure 4 shows coal bed and lithologic <br />nomenclature. Figure 5 is an illustration of geologic cross section of the mine site. <br />Access to the coal from the outcrop is difficult due the extensive bum zone. <br />4.3 Hvdrologic Settine <br />Early hydrologic studies conducted by Westmoreland Resources in the Mine vicinity <br />indicate that there aze no bedrock groundwater supply wells within the permit azea. This <br />is attributed to the low permeability of the water bearing strata, the lenticular nature of <br />the sandstone strata and the generally poor quality of water. Groundwater is recharged <br />by direct infiltration and runoff at outcrops and subcrops underneath the colluvial <br />sediments where saturated. Groundwater flow follows the dip of the bedrock strata; <br />however, the flow is very slow due the low transmissivity and the limited amount of <br />water infiltrating the groundwater aquifer system. <br />Groundwater is unconfined neaz the outcrop and becomes confined down dip. <br />Groundwater in the bedrock aquifer contains bicarbonate, sodium, and sulfate with total <br />dissolved solids (TDS) ranging from 400 to over 10,000 mg/1. TDS concentration <br />increases with depth. <br />As noted by Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (DBMS) in its document <br />entitled "Proposed Decision and Findings for Compliance for a Mining and Reclamation <br />Permit-Permit Revision I3o 9-October I1, 2005", the impacts to groundwater "within the <br />permit azea should be minimal, due to the relative lack of useable groundwater and due <br />the vertical separation which exists" between coal seams and the "Rollins Sandstone <br />which [is] located considerably below the mining elevation (Refer to Figure 1) Local <br />alluvial systems downgradient from the mine should not receive sufficient mine water <br />drainage to create any impacts." Water produced from the areas historically or currently <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.