Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 14 <br />Sensitivity Analysis <br />Hydraulic Conductivity <br />4930.0 <br />4925 <br />0 <br />. <br />4920 <br />0 <br />. <br />4915 <br />0 <br />. <br />a9~o <br />o <br />. <br />4905 <br />0 <br />. <br />4900 <br />0 <br />. <br />MWi MW2 MW3 MW4 MWS MW6 MW7 <br />5.2 Recharge <br /> <br />i .~ <br /> <br /> <br /> -~ 60% <br />- 110% -~- 80% <br />-?~- 130°(° <br /> YE-160% <br />~-- Observedl X190% <br />-Modeled <br /> <br /> <br />A sensitivity analysis was also run on recharge. Recharge values were varied between 50°lo below and 110% above the <br />assigned values. See Table 11 below reporting the results of the sensitivity analysis. Overall a reduction in the recharge <br />rate by 40% caused the calibrated water levels to decrease by an average of 1.5 feet and an increase in recharge by . <br />90% caused the calibrated levels to increase by an average of 0.3 feet. <br />Table 11 <br />Sensitivity Analysis of <br />Recharge <br />Percent Pine Creek Valle Fill Eolian MW1 MW2 MW3 MW4 MW5 MW6 MW7 <br />50% 1.1 3.0 1.8 4910.5 4910.2 4914.7 4920.7 4922.6 4921.4 4923.6 <br />75% 1.7 4.5 2.7 4911.1 4910.6 4915.2 4921.9 4923.9 4922.1 4924.3 <br />110°l0 2.4 6.6 4.0 4912.0 4911.1 4915.7 4923.5 4925.5 4923.1 4925.2 <br />Notes: <br />Modeled groundwater levels reported for each monitodng well location. <br />Groundwater Model Report - SW TKO Water Storage Project - i t - February 2005 <br />