My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE66733
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE66733
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:12:30 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:31:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/30/2003
Doc Name
pages 2-523a to 2-576u
Section_Exhibit Name
2.7 Hydrology Part 4
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
local Soil Conservation Service (Hill, 1980). Table 2.7-12 gives estimates <br />of average annual yields for the Trapper Mine drainages. Most of the runoff <br />occurs during the months of April, May and June, while the crops need water <br />mainly in July and August. The runoff from any of the major drainages in <br />the Trapper Mine would not supply water for continuing irrigation. Evapor- <br />ation and pond seepage would probably use at least half the runoff water. <br />For example, the estimated annual yield of Pyeatt Gulch is 154 ac-ft. This <br />would probably irrigate only 20 to 38 acres for average years after losses. <br />Irrigation of lands in drainages with fill material with surface water from <br />the Trapper Mine drainages would therefore not be economical. <br />In most samples, the natural molybdenum concentration in surface runoff from <br />the Trapper Mine area has exceeded the recommended limit for continuous <br />irrigation use. Table 2.7-18 should be consulted for concentrations of <br />• molybdenum in surface runoff from the Trapper Mine. Copper, iron, lithium <br />and manganese have exceeded their recommended limits in a few samples. <br />Total dissolved solids have been close to the upper recommended limit and <br />would probably exceed the limit at times with evaporation in a holding reser- <br />voir. Therefore, the water quality from the Trapper mine drainages would <br />probably not be suitable for irrigation at times, even if sufficient water <br />was available. <br />r_.-,.,.., a..., . e.- <br />Groundwater conditions for the Trapper mine have been presented in Section <br />2.7.5 Additional information on the ground-water conditions at the potential <br />AVF sites is presented in this section. Monitoring wells were drilled in <br />Pyeatt and Flume Gulches because the geologic information indicated that <br />• these two gulches have fill material and have the most potential to be im- <br />patted. Data on completion of wells and pump tests which were used to define <br />2-539 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.