My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE66636
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE66636
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:12:25 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:29:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1998013
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/22/1998
Doc Name
DIVISION ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
DMG
To
HALL IRWIN CONSTRUCTION CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />r~ <br />/ Engineer has stated that prior to these various uses of ground water, the applicant will need to <br />obtain either a gravel pit or other type of well permit, as applicable. However, prior to obtaining <br />a permit, an approved water supply plan or decreed plan for augmentation is required. Please <br />indicate how compliance will be be achieved with Rule 3.1.6(1)(a) regazding Colorado water <br />laws and regulations goveming injury to existing water rights. Please see attached comments <br />from the Office of the State Engineer. <br />J 2. Page 30 of the application lists ] 0 shallow alluvial wells that occur within 600 feet of the <br />proposed operation. Megan Sullivan of the Office of the State Engineer has stated that prior to <br />approving a well permit, the applicant must document the locations of all wells within 600 feet of <br />the permit azea and obtain a waiver of objection from all well owners with wells within 600 feet <br />of the permit azea or request a hearing before the State Engineer. Please indicate how <br />compliance will be achieved with Rule 3.1.6(1)(a) regazding Colorado water laws and <br />regulations goveming injury to existing water rights. Please see attached comments from the <br />Office of the State Engineer. <br />Exhibit J -Vegetative Information <br />1. As required by Rule 6.4.10, please indicate if there aze any noxious weeds present within the <br />proposed 309.83 acre petmit azea. If so, you will be required to provide a weed control plan for <br />the noxious weed(s) present in order to achieve compliance with Rule 3.1.10 (6). Please see <br />attached comments from the Longmont Soil Conservation District. y;p <br />2. As required by Rules 6.4.7(4) and 6.4.10(1)(a), please indicate if there aze any wetlands /}r <br />within the proposed 309.84 acre permit azea. If so, please revise the Existing Conditions Map to'~cJ <br />include the location of any wetland(s) and provide a description of how potential impacts to these <br />azeas will be minimized. Please see attached comments from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. <br />Exhibit L -Reclamation Costs <br />yd <br />Page 38 of the application lists a total reclamation cost of $228,000 for a maximum allowable ~ ; ~~ <br />disturbance of 45 acres at any one time. The Division concurs with this estimate. However, in, n"° `~ <br />view of comment number 1 under Exhibit E - Reclamatio Plan, please be advised that bonding <br />costs may change depending on adequacy review responses <br />Exhibit S - Petmanent Man-Made Structures <br />J Page I of the application lists six (6) laterals and irrigation ditches that meander through the <br />property. The Division considers each of these laterals and irrigation ditches to be a permanent <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.