Laserfiche WebLink
Snowcap Coal Co. Inc WWTF Water Quality Assessment CO-0027146 <br />Industrial processes at this facility would not generate hexavalent chromium and therefore the <br />evaluation for chomium is limited to the trivalent form. <br />Using the mass-balance equation provided in the beginning of Section IV, the low flows provided in <br />Section III, the background concentrations contained in Section II, and the in-stream standards for <br />metals shown in Section II, assimilative capacities were calculated. The data used and the resulting <br />calculations of the allowable discharge concentrations, Mz, are set forth in Table A-6 for chronic <br />assimilative capacities and in Table A-7 for acute assimilative capacities. <br />Table A-6 <br />Chronic Assimilative Ca acities for Metals <br />Xvcm*'Y D v ~ r 1. ' <br />O/;'QmCt 1~' ~ P~ 4+ <br />Q ~~CfS~ n <br />`~~ Z~ 6~~5 .w. r~~rm-~r~,"F <br />~ 3~~C.~~J kYr~ 9aM .c <br />3,.1'1 "- , at <br />r r.:;_3t ,r. ' 1 $- -a,• <br />bM~~ ,s~. rSK'; <br />~IYOteS~ <br />Cd, Dis ug/1) 235 0.91 235.91 0.39 4.5 1,066 1 <br />Cu, Dis (ug/1) 235 0.91 235.91 9.1 20 2,835 1 <br />Fe, Dis (ug/1) 235 0.91 235.91 20 300 72,608 <br />Fe, Trec ug/1) 235 0.91 235.91 695 1000 79,764 1 <br />Pb, Dis (ugJl) 235 0.91 235.91 4.8 6.9 549 1 <br />Mn, Dis ug/1) 235 0.91 235.91 15 50 9,088 <br />Hg, Tot (ug/1) 235 0.91 235.91 0 0.010 2.6 2 <br />Ni, Dis (ug/1) 235 0.91 235.91 0 116 30,072 3 <br />Se, Dis (ug/1) 235 0.91 235.91 1.0 4.6 934 <br />Ag, Dis (ug/1) 235 0.91 235.91 0 1.6 415 <br />Zn, Dis (ug/1) 235 0.91 235.91 85 263 46,230 1 <br />Note 1: Only limited ambient background data were available for dissolved cadmium, dissolved copper, total recoverable iron, dissolved lead <br />and dissolved zinc. However, alrtgst 50 samples for these metals in total foan were available. in order to use a broader base of data and <br />provide a conservative level of evaluation, the total metals data were used in this evaluation for the aforementioned parameters. <br />Note 2: Current data were available for rotal mercury but were found at values of less than detectable levels based on a detection ]evel of 0.2 <br />up/I. Consistent with the WQCD's standard approach for summarization and averaging, a value of zero is used when sample results are found at <br />less than detection levels and thus a concentration of zero was used ro establish the background concentration for total mercury. <br />Note 3: No torten[ data were available for dissolved nickel. Findings of wmparable studies suggest [ha[ pollutants consistently found at I <br />than detection levers in-stream are deleted as pollutants of concem for a water body and are no knger analyzed when in-stream sampling <br />performed. Thus, it has bern assumed that dissolved nickel has been elirtdna[ed as a pollutant of concem in the receiving stream Based on thi <br />assumption, a background concentratlon of zero was used for dissolved nickel. <br />J <br />Appendix A Page 10 of 12 last Revised 9/15/2003 <br />