Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />~ ~ ~»caca <br />3 <br />• 5.0 <br />CONCLUSIO;]S ~1VD R£CO?E~?EVDaTIO:<S <br />During the period 23-31 August 1973, a section of the <br />Yampa River near Craig, Colorado caas losing 10 to 17 cubic feet <br />per second or four to eight percent of the upstream flow to <br />ground-water recharge. The loss section was an 800 foot stretch <br />beginning 1.0 miles upstream of the confluence of the Yampa River <br />and tdilliams Fork. Losses across the entire 4.6 mile reach from <br />S.H. 13 to the confluence with [~,'illiams Fork were 10 to 11 cfs, <br />or four to five percent of the flow at S.H. 13. This included <br />an estimated evapotranspirative loss of about two cfs, yielding <br />net losses of eight to nine cfs. Whereas the net losses Caere <br />less than the probable recharge losses, it is possible that tcao <br />to eight cfs were being discharged from ground water to the river. <br />It was determined that, if present, this discharge was occurring <br />over a one mile stretch beginning two miles below S.H. 13. This <br />• cannot be conclusively stated for three reasons: (1) there Caere <br />n0 %vil5i5i:c:,it f~21d data ~u inLLi~citt ~hdC ground-cater d15Charge <br />was occurring at any point, (2) the amounts involved are so small <br />as to be near the confidence limits of the field techniques, 4:id <br />(3) changes in channel storage, if present, could not be fully <br />evaluated. <br />Although the above results were observed during Che <br />period of this study, it is likely that results would be differ- <br />ent during another oeriod under different antcedent conditions. <br />The winter of 1977-78 was unusually wet, and snowmelC in the <br />mountains provided significant base flora into the late summer. <br />On the other hand, the summer was normally dry. This helped <br />achieve steady-state conditions. Hocaever, during weC times, it <br />is likely that there would be some ground-water discharge to the <br />river. Unfortunately, a study during a wet period would be ex- <br />tremely difficult to perform accurately. However, if ground- <br />water discharge were occurring during a wet period, the higher <br />• river floras would provide significantly increased dilution ca- <br />pacity for any dissolved substances present in the ground water. <br />5-1 <br />