My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE66317
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE66317
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:12:11 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:17:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981034
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/1/1998
Doc Name
pg 78 to 156
Section_Exhibit Name
SECTION 2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 2.05.4(2)(e)(vi) <br />The 1963 vegetation study employed the line intercept method to <br />measure the cover on the mine reference areas. Since 1983, the use <br />of an optical point frame has become more widespread and preferred <br />in reclaimed communities such as that which exists at the mine <br />site. Rule 4.15.7(1) states that "Consistency in sampling <br />methodology shall be required in comparisons between the reclaimed <br />area and undisturbed areas". It is unlikely that the operator will <br />sample the reclaimed area during the Phase III process using the <br />line intercept method. Instead, the .point intercept method will <br />most likely be employed. As the similarity in their names implies, <br />the two methods are conceptually consistent. Both are more <br />objective than ocular estimation techniques, and both are based on <br />counting or measuring how often a span or series of points <br />intercept vegetation on the ground when viewed from above (and <br />perpendicular to the ground). Both methods are acceptable as far <br />as the DMG's Guidelines for Compliance with Land Use and Vegetation <br />Requirements of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for Coal <br />Mining, October, 1988 is concerned. When done properly, both <br />methods are expected to give similar results, though the optical <br />point frame can be expected to be more precise and, therefore more <br />desirable. Thus, either method should be able to be employed <br />• during Phase III bond release procedures to determine if the <br />reclaimed areas have a non-noxious perennial vegetative cover <br />exceeding 908 of the accepted technical standard of 238. <br />Should the optical point intercept technique be employed during <br />cover sampling, methods will be as follows. Point sitings will be <br />made using an optical point frame and will be located along a 25 <br />meter transect stretched out either northwest, northeast, <br />southwest, or southeast of the sample location (the direction will <br />be randomly selected from the four possibilities). The 50 points <br />per transect (one point at each half meter interval) will comprise <br />a single sample unit. Cover will be identified by species, or as <br />rock, litter, or bare ground. For the purposes of estimating total <br />vegetative cover, only first hit data will be used. If the <br />operator opts to use the line intercept technique, methods will <br />follow those described in the Appendix F. <br />• <br />133a (Rev. 6-28-96) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.