Laserfiche WebLink
agree that the ownership or maintenance responsibilities for the street lights have transferred to <br />CDOT. See Affidavit of Medill McC. Barnes, ¶ 3, attached hereto as Exhibit A. <br />4. There has been no transfer of title to the light poles. Exhibit A, ¶ 4. <br />5. SDMD's basis for objection and status as an objector has not changed. There is no <br />dispute that at least some of SDMD's light poles are located within two hundred feet of the affected <br />lands. SDMD still may demonstrate that it is "directly and adversely affected or aggrieved by the <br />conduct of a mining operation, proposed mining operation, or an order ofthe Board, and [its] interest <br />is entitled to legal protection under the Act." See Mineral Rules and Regulations, Definitions, Rule 1 <br />(34.1) (2004). <br />WHEREFORE, the SDMD requests that the Applicant's motion to deny party status to <br />SDMD be denied and that SDMD's party status be recognized and that it be permitted to fully <br />participate in the heazing scheduled for December 14, 2005. <br />DATED this 8th day of December, 2005. <br />GRIMSHAW & HAl/Rj~ING, P.C. <br />a~l , Il/~c <br />By: <br />Lisa K. ayers <br />ATTORNEYS FOR OBJECTOR <br />SIL VER DOLLAR METROPOLITAN <br />DISTRICT <br />