My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE65613
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE65613
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:11:23 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:58:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1987171
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/13/1994
Doc Name
REQUEST FOR REAFFIRMATION OF ORIGINAL APPROVAL FOUNTAIN COLONY PIT FN M-87-171
From
FOUNTAIN COLONY INVESTMENT CO
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• Page 2 <br />Permitting of this site will formally add to those available reserves to support the needs of [he <br />community. <br />After issuance of the permit, Fountain Colony Investment will maintain the permit in good <br />sanding through submittal of annual reports, annual fees, and whatever other informational <br />requirements are needed to maintain the permit in good standing. Meanwhile, Fountain Colony <br />Investment will continue to seek a company interested in operating the site. Over the years a <br />number of companies have expressed an interest in the site, but none have actually moved <br />forward with signing an agreement. In all cases the reasons for their declining the opportunity <br />was internal to those companies or related to general economic conditions, and not because of <br />a problem with the site or the quality of the reserves. <br />It is fully recognized that the existing permit application may not be totally consistent with <br />what is required or expected in a permit application today. But, in our review of your rules, <br />the deficiencies are relatively minor and could be added later when an operator is found. <br />Furthermore, it is not unlikely that an operator would want to make some of their own changes <br />iit the permit prior to their starting operations. Those changes would be made, depending upon <br />the nature of the changes, through an amendment or technical revision. Depending upon the <br />desires of the operator, either Fountain Colony Investment themselves would maintain the <br />permit after operations begin or the new operator would assume the permit through a <br />succession of operator. <br />It is requested that instead of the full bond amount being required, as if the operation were [o <br />begin, a minimal contingency bond be reyuired. In essence, this bond would allow the permit <br />ro issue but would not allow any operations to begin. [n the 1988 application approval a <br />X51,000 bond was required. Probably that bond would not be adequate by today's standards, <br />even if only inflation was considered. Cne of the conditions of the requested Board action <br />would be to have your staff prepare a new bond calculation at the time the site is ready to be <br />mined. No mining could occur until that bond was provided, in addition to all the other <br />conditions being met. <br />With these points in mind, we propose the following conditions to this approval. <br />Prior to initiation of operations, a bond amount, to be determined by the Division of <br />Minerals and Geology, must be submitted and approved. This bond amount would be based <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.