Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Peter V. O'Connor <br />November 29, 1983 <br />Page 3 <br />The following comment and response corresponds to your letter dated <br />November 21, 1983. <br />MLRD Comment: <br />In reviewing Exhibit E - Reclamation Plan for a second time, <br />the Division is unable to determine how IRI proposes to <br />abandon the various drill holes. Please specify how IRI <br />will reclaim the different drill holes. The operator is <br />encouraged to review Rule 5.41 of the Rules and Regulations <br />pertaining to drill hole abandonment. <br />IRI Response: <br />The production wells will be plugged with a 50-foot column <br />of cement at the bottom of the casing. The balance of the <br />casing will be fil <br />feet of surface. <br />feet below surface <br />as a surface plug. <br />entire casing with <br />cut-off casing. <br />led with a gel plugging mud to within 13 <br />The well casings will be cut off three <br />and a 10-foot column of cement will serve <br />Alternatively, IRI may elect to fill the <br />cement from the bottom to the top of the <br />If you have any further questions please call me. <br />Sin rely, <br />~~~ ~~~ <br />Martin A. Jones, P.E. <br />Environmental Engineer <br />MAJ/vc <br />cc: E. C. Rosar - IRI <br />E. Hinzel -Camp, <br />E. D. Lindquist <br />Project File <br />DISTRIBUTION COPY <br />G. D. Aho <br />R. M. Tuthill <br />E. K. Norppa <br />R. L. Day <br />T. E. Louderback <br />Dresser & McKee <br />