My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO27962
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO27962
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:47:18 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:43:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980002
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
6/15/1984
Doc Name
OHIO CREEK COAL MINE 2
From
FOX CONSULTANTS INC
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
PROF POND CERTIFICATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
:t <br />May 28, 1984 <br />MINCON INC., P.C. <br />5504 Jefferson Ave. <br />Denver, Colorado 80237 <br />(303)753-1729 <br />(303) 758-3706 RECEIVED <br />Mr. George [d.L. Robinson <br />Fox Consultants Inc. <br />710 Kipling <br />Lakewood, Colorado 80226 <br />Dear 61r. Robinson: <br />JUN 1 51984 <br />MINED LAND RECLAMAl10N OIVISIOM <br />Cola OeAt o! Nafura! Retipul~ <br />Per our phone conversations during the week of May 14th, Mincon <br />Inc. P.C. is pleased to provide professional services to verify <br />the construction of the sedimentation pond at the O.C. :~o. 2 ?,:ine. <br />2ond design criteria has been supplied by Fox Consultants and is <br />based on the Gingery Associates Inc.'s report dated July 16, 1980. <br />On May 21st, a site visit was made by Mr. William Balaz, Mincon, <br />accompanied by Mr. Bob Weaver, O.C. No. 2 Mine Foreman. The <br />dimensions of the constructed pond were measured and compared tc <br />the Gingery Associates' design specifications. The results are: <br />1•) The pond is built in the approximate location on the <br />hillside as shown but may be slightly lower in elevation. <br />This is based on a calculated top of berm elevation of <br />9080 (by altimeter) compared to a design elevation of <br />9139.5• This appears to have been done to facilitate <br />construction by minimizing the cut required and to <br />locate the pond on a flatter slope. <br />2.) The pond is constructed to approximate design dimensions <br />as shown in the Appendix. <br />3•) The pond slopes appear to approximate the required 2:1 <br />and 3:1 grades. Calculations and comments based on field <br />observations are included in the A ppendix. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.