My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE64638
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE64638
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:10:34 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:29:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
GEOMORPHIC & ENGINEERING ANALYSIS OF COLO YAMPA COAL CO ECKMAN PARK MINE FINAL REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />Engineering and geomorphic analysis of the Colorado Yampa Coal <br />Company Eckman Park Mine provides the following conclusions: <br />1. Existing slope gradients are not significantly different from <br />approved slope gradients. <br />2. Drainage density (number of drainages per square mile) is within <br />the limits of natural variation of drainage density and, <br />therefore, has not been altered significantly. <br />3. The swale at the upper portions of the mine does not constitute <br />a significant departure from the approved plan and it is not <br />inconsistent with surrounding natural landforms. <br />4. Erosive power of stream channels has not been significantly <br />changed by mining and reclamation except for specific areas <br />• where channel gradient has been increased. <br />5. The majority of existing and approved channels are stable for <br />the 10-year, 24-hour event (assuming a 12 foot channel 'width) <br />except for isolated reaches with increased gradient. <br />6. Vegetation is important in maintaining long term stability. <br />Objective geomorphic and engineering analysis of the Eckman Park <br />Mine indicates that the existing topography is not significantly <br />different from the approved postmining topography. Several isolated <br />reaches of reclaimed stream channel are significantly more erosive than <br />approved stream channels due to an increase in channel slope. These <br />reaches will require application of one or more mitigation alternatives <br />• in order to reduce the potential for erosion. <br />v <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.