My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE64512
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE64512
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:10:28 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:26:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/24/2007
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 77 Deer Creek Shaft Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Limited-Resolts Archaeological Survey Form (Page 3 of 3) <br />addition, features associated with historic mining have been recorded along ffie river valley <br />and the lower portions of adjacent gulches. <br />26. Expected Results: It was expected that a small number of prehistoric artifacts or historic <br />features associated with livestock grazing world be found in lower open <br />areas near water. Prehistoric or historic artifacts or features were not <br />anticipated on the less accessible ridgetops away from sources of water. <br />VI. STA'I1zMLN'y OF OFJECTIVE.S <br />27. The objecfive of this survey was to locate and document any prehistoric or historic cultural <br />resources within the identified survey blocks. These resounxs were to be recorded, and if any <br />were considered significant and potentially eligible far the Naiionat Register, plans would have <br />been developed to avoid any adverse impacts to the resources. <br />VII. FIELD METHODS <br />2~. Def'mibons: Site Prehistoric site =five or more prehistoric artifacts or fewer flier five artifacts <br />with feature. Historic sites =10 or more items. <br />1F Prehistoric = up m four items; historic =rip to nine it~s_ <br />29. Describe Survey RfeHrod: <br />All gently to moderately sloging areas within the survey blocks were surveyed bypedestrian iransects <br />at 15- to 20-meter intervals. In areas of dense trees or brush, straight transec[s and regular intervals <br />were maintained bo the extent feasible. Steep slopes (greater than 30 percent grade} were not walked <br />systematically, but were visually scanned for indications of strucharal features (mines, mods, small <br />buildings) or potential rockshelters. <br />VIII.RESIILTS <br />30. List IFs if applicable. Indicate IF' locations on the map completed for Part ID[. <br />A. Smithsonian Number. none Description <br />B. Smithsonian Number: Description <br />C_ SmilbsonianNnmber. Description <br />D. SmithsonianNumirur: Description <br />31. IIsing your professional Imowledge of the region, why are there none or very limited <br />cultural remains in the project area? Is there subsarfaee potential? <br />Most of the project area is too rugged or too far from reliable sor>rces ofwaber. Sediments are rocky <br />and poorly consolidated, and there is very little potential for rmdiscovered sabsurface cultural <br />materials. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.