Laserfiche WebLink
Elliott_v. Pelrsol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828} ("without authority, its <br />judgments and orders are regarded as nullifies. They are not voidable, but simply <br />void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition <br />fo them. They constitute no jusUficatlan; and all persons concerned in executing <br />such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers. This <br />distinction runs through all the cases on the subject; and it proves, that the <br />jurisdiction of any court exercising authorHy over a subject, may be inquired into <br />in every court, when the proceedings of the fanner are relted on and brought <br />before the latter, by the party claiming the benefit of such proceedings,"}; In re <br />TIP-PA-HANS Enterprises, Inc., 27 B.R. 780, 783 (1983) (a judge "lacks <br />jurisdiction in a particular case until it has been demonstrated that jurisdictien <br />over the subject matter exists"j (when a judge acts "outside the limits of his <br />jurisdiction, he becomes a trespasser ... ".) ("._ +:ourts have held that where <br />Courts of speaal or limited jurisdiction exceed their rightful powers, the whole <br />proceeding Is coram non judice ... ")_ <br />Trespasser is defined in Black's Law IIictianary (6th Edition) as One who has <br />committed unlawful interference with one's person, property, or rights. If a judge <br />acts without subject-matterjurisdiction, the judge is acting unlawfully, he/she has <br />committed an unlawful interference with one's person, property, or rights. <br />Is the judge who ads without subject-matterjurisdldion then anything but a <br />common criminal? <br />And all orders and judgments issued by a judge who ads without subject-matter <br />jurisdiction are, as a matter of law, void. <br />The law is well-settled that a void order or judgment is void even before reversal. <br />Vallev v Northern Fire & Marine ins. Co., 254 U.S. 348, 41 S.Ct. 116 (1920) <br />("Courts are constituted by authority and they cannot go beyond that power <br />delegated to them. If they ad beyond that authority, and certainly in <br />contravention of it, their judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They <br />are not voidable, but simply VOID, ANb THlS EVEN PR1OR TO Rt_VERSAL" <br />(Emphasis added]); Old Wayne Mut, 1. Assoc. v. Mcbonouah, 204 U. S. 8, 27 <br />S.Ct. 236 (1907); Williamson v. Berry. 8 How. 495, 540, 12 l.Ed. 1170, 1189 <br />(1850); );ose v. Mimely, 4 Cranch 241, 269, 2 L.Ed. 608, 617 (1808). <br />Remember, it is about srontrad and you do have free will to contract. So where <br />do you want to function? Under the "spirit" of the constitution, as determined by <br />