My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO27678
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO27678
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:47:06 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:18:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1974015
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Name
AN ANALYSIS OF POSSIBLE GROUNDWATER & SURFACE WATER IMPACTS RESULTING FROM LYONS ROCKIN WP GRAVEL P
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />t <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />pre-mining simulation. The differences in the water levels were considered the water level changes <br />resulting from mining. These changes for each simulation are summarized below and in the <br />referenced appendices. Water level changes resulting from each scenario were categorized into risk <br />categories. <br />4.6.1 Ground Water Level Changes During Mining <br />Ground water level changes during mining were simulated based on a worst-case scenario in which <br />the entire mined area was mined and dewatered simultaneously. In actualit}', mining will occur in <br />phases over more than 30 yeazs, and consequently, water level impacts will be concentrated in one <br />region while that azea is mined. Lazge-scale dewatering will never occur over the entire mined azea <br />simultaneously. The mined azeas will ultimately include low permeability barriers at their edges, <br />constructed with compacted shale slopes. These barriers will help to mitigate ground water level <br />changes occurring outside of the mined area. To account for these barriers, simtlations were <br />performed in which the entire mined areas are dewatered within the barriers. However, during <br />mining of the fringes of the pits, the barriers will not be installed, and dewatering will occur for part <br />of the mining operation while the barriers are not in place. In order to account for this type of <br />operation, aworst-case scenazio simulation was performed in which the entire mine is dewatered <br />without any barriers in place. The findings of these simulations are summarized bel~aw. <br />Modeled water level elevation contours during mining with the barrier installed aze: presented in <br />Appendix R, and water level drawdown contours are presented in Appendix S. As noted on these <br />maps, water level drawdowns aze greatest inside the mine, as expected. Outside of the mine, water <br />levels aze slightly lower than before mining in some locations and aze slightly higher than before <br />mining in other locations. Generally, water level changes are limited to azeas sout:i of the South <br />Branch; the South Branch and St. Vrain River buffer the water level impacts north of the streams. <br />The exception to this is water level impacts resulting from the pit located north of the South Branch <br />to be mined during Phase II of the amended application (shown and the Phase II pond on Figure 1). <br />During mining of this pond, water level impacts could occur north of the South Branch. Along the <br />_17_ <br />lti.cdn/1-lirvipwi.I~~nr'm/rs, /ur. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.