My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE64022
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE64022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:10:02 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:14:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004043
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/13/2004
Doc Name
Historical Society Report & letter to Las Animas County
From
Valco Inc
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Robert A. Lucero <br />Las Animas County Planning and Land Use Office <br />August 6, 2004 <br />page 2 <br />findings of Mr. Carrillo, and Ms. Sehan Dwells, a professional prehistoric <br />archaeologist. Their findings are summarized on page 3 and include the <br />following quotations: <br />"...survey and site recording revealed no evidence of "burials". <br />"...presumed groundstone artifacts at Temporary Site...were <br />naturally produced" <br />"Temporary Site 04.VTP.02 did represent a prehistoric site and <br />was recorded..." <br />"One linear site...20th century trail or wagon road...is not <br />considered eligible to the NRHP/SRHP and no further work is <br />recommended. <br />"All observed cultural remains have been examined, and recorded <br />as outlined above. Clearance of the Valco T Pit project is <br />recommended. <br />Valco Inc. has fully investigated the possibility of an "Indian Burial Ground" on the <br />property and concluded that (1) there are no observable grave sites on the <br />property, and (2) that the nature of the property itself does not lend itself to being <br />an "Indian Burial Ground". Further, the identified historical sites are minimalist in <br />nature, have been properly recorded, and should offer no impediment to <br />proceeding with pit process. The existing nearby gravel pits east, north, and west <br />of the proposed Valco T Pit have, apparently, not posed a historically significant <br />problem in the past. <br />Please schedule us for a re-hearing on this matter as soon as possible and advise <br />Tom Brubaker of the schedule. <br />Sincerely, <br />~ `~~ <br />A, Reid Jones <br />Vice President -Finance <br />ARJ:pc <br />enclosures <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.