Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Mike Owens AEE Project No. 6J77-0OOOtb <br />Sinclair Pipeline Easement Stability Study November a, 1996 <br />Del Camino Pit Pape 2 <br />Weld County, CO <br />A comment about rapid draw down is in order. This refers to the development of hydrostatic uplift <br />pressure in a soil slope when the water level is taken down faster than the ability of the material <br />to drain or dissipate pore water pressure. For a granular soil such as is being mined on this site, <br />we expect fairly rapid dissipation of pore water pressure due to the highly permeable nature of the <br />material. For the temporary condition where a steep, un-reclaimed pit slope is allowed to flood <br />(i.e. tum off the dewatering pumps), and then the pit is pumped out, we would expel the slope <br />to have first raveled to near the angle of repose, somewhere between 1:1 to 1.5H:1V, due to <br />seepage forces and the high ground water exit gradient. Because the permeability of sand and <br />gravel is fairly high, and about 22 feet of hydrostatic head would have to be dealt with to again <br />make the pit dry, it would be reasonable to expect that the perimeter dewatering system will be <br />in operation concurrent with the pumping out of the pit. Therefore, it is unlikely that rapid draw <br />down would occur because drained sand and gravel would be well back into the embankment as <br />the pit is pumped out. <br />Recognizing DMG's comments and the realities of sand and gravel mining, we recommend that <br />mining be done with temporary pit slopes no steeper than 0.5H:1V, and more shallow if pit <br />conditions necessitate. In the unsaturated condition, analysis of this configuration gives a factor <br />of safety of 2.54 for a failure surface extending from the mining limit 30 feet back to the easement <br />line. Considering an average of 3 feet of positive pore pressure along the saturated length of the <br />same failure surface, a factor of safety of 1.36 was generated. This is considered to be adequate. <br />In this analysis, we have considered the pipeline easement as essentially inviolable. The <br />easement line leaves a minimum of 20 feet and a maximum of 40 feet horizontally to the pipeline <br />location. This is with the understanding that should slumping and raveling into the pit occur from <br />gravity, flooding or future dewatering, the failure surface will daylight within the zone between the <br />mining limit (set bads) and the pipeline easement and can be relatively easily repaired. If it must <br />be demonstrated that absolutely no encroachment into the area behind the mining limit can occur, <br />then even temporary pit slopes should be cut no steeper than 1.3H:1V, which is the approximate <br />long-term angle of repose. However, this does limit the recovery of a valuable, permitted resource <br />for little, if any benefit. As with any slope steeper than the natural angle of repose, it is <br />recommended that reclamation to plan contours be done as soon as practicable. It is our opinion <br />that the above recommendations will not result in slope failures that extend within the pipeline <br />easement. <br />