My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE63261
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE63261
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:09:25 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:54:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1996052
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/8/1996
Doc Name
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING OPINION AND RESPONSE TO COMMENTS POST MINING STABILITY OF THE SINCLAIR PIPE
To
OWENS BROTHERS CONCRETE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• III IIIIIIIIIIIII III • <br />999 <br />~ r ~,g~ <br />~~H <br />~,. <br />November 8, 1996 <br />Owens Brothers Concrete <br />5550 Sheridan Boulevard <br />Arvada, Colorado 80004 <br />~~ <br />AEE Protect No. 8-317-000015 <br />Attention: Mr. Mike Owens <br />RE: Geotechnical Engineering Opinion and Response to Comments <br />Post-Mining Stability of the Sinclair Pipeline Easement <br />Owens Brothers Concrete Company <br />Del Camino Sand and Gravel Mine <br />Weld County, Colorado <br />Dear Mr. Owens: <br />We have received comments dated October 18, 1996 from the State of Colorado Division of <br />Minerals and Geology (DMG), through Gary Curtiss and prepared by Allen Sorenson. Their letter <br />relates to the amount of setback that should be required to keep the Sindair Pipeline safe from <br />slope stability issues in worst-case and extreme worst-case mining scenarios. They have no <br />problem with the application from the standpoint of post-mining, redaimed configuration. <br />The concern expressed by DMG is with temporary vertical or near vertical cut slopes that might <br />be made and left un-redaimed under various conditions. We agree with their analysis and <br />condusions that vertical slopes are indeed unstable under unsaturated, saturated or rapid draw- <br />down conditions. <br />If the unlikely event of DMG's Case B were to occur with Failure Surface #3 (FS=1.25), the <br />Sindair Pipeline would be within the failed area under rapid drawdown conditions, because the <br />pipeline is located 5 feet doser to the east easement line than the west line. <br />We do not recommend vertical slopes in granular materials, even temporarily, because it cannot <br />be shown that such a slope will stand. The issue is to recommend the slope that will allow the <br />operator to recover the maximum amount of permitted resource safely, with a minimum of risk to <br />personnel and equipment safety as well as future exposure to repair work outside of mining limits <br />and easement lines. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.