My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE62830
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE62830
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:09:06 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:43:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 11 Colorado Discharge Permit - NPDES
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PART I <br />Page 5 <br />Perini[ No. CO-0044776 <br />•A. DEFINITION OF EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS <br />4. Burden of Proof Requirements <br />The permittee has the burden of proof when requesting relief from total suspended solids (TSS), total iron and/or <br />settleable solids limitations, as appropriate. The permittee should endeavor to mee[ the primary limitations <br />whenever possible. Relief is not available for mine drainage alone, nor when dte majority of a discharge consists of <br />mine drainage. <br />For rainfall, to waive TSS and total iron limitations, it is necessary to demonsvate [hat discharge occurred within 48 <br />hours after measurable precipitation has stopped. To waive settleable solids limitations, it is necessary to prove tha[ <br />discharge occurred within 48 hours after precipitation greater than the 10-year, 24-hour even[ has stopped. <br />For snowmelt, to waive TSS and total iron limitations, it is necessary to demonstrate that discharge occurred within <br />48 hours after pond inflow has stopped. To waive settleable solids limitations, i[ is necessary to prove that <br />discharge occurred within 48 hours after pond inflow volume greater than the 10-yeaz, 24-hour event has stopped. <br />Should a precipitation event or snowmelt occur, [he permittee shall submit adequate proof in order for an exemption <br />to be claimed. Weather station data should be submitted where appropriate. Documentation that the treatment <br />facilities were properly operated and maintained prior to and during the storm event must be submitted with any <br />request for relief. Additionally for outfall 002 the Rrmittee mutt demonstrate that the maiority of the discharge <br />for which the exemption is claimed consists of surface runoff. Said proof shall be submitted as an attachment to the <br />Discharge Monitoring Repot[ (DMR) for the appropriate period. The Division shall determine the adequacy of <br />proof. As part of this de[ermination, the Division shall evaluate whether the permittee could have controlled the <br />discharge in such a manner [hat primary limitations could have been met, whether proper sediment storage levels <br />were maintained and the ponds had sufficient water and sedimen[ capacity for the storm event plus other relevant <br />factors. All manual pond dewatering must meet TSS and total iron limitations unless previous approval has been <br />granted for ponds that have t~ other method of dewatering. For ponds with automatic dewatering structures, only <br />discharges through these strucmres are eligible for [he exemption. <br />5. Post-Mining Areas <br />In conformance with 40 CFR 434.50, commencing a[ the [ime active mining has ceased and all surface azeas served <br />by a sedimentation pond have been returned to the required contour and revegetation has commenced, applicable <br />discharges may be eligible for limitations other than [hose specified in Pan I.A.I. In most cases, these pos[-mining <br />limitations shall remain in effect until bond release. The permittee shall notify dte Division at the appropriate time <br />so that consideration of permit modifications can be made. Prior to notification and subsequent permit modifica[ion, <br />active mining limitations will apply regardless of actual mine stains. <br />6. Whole Effluent Toeicity Testinp,~eauirements (Acutel - OutfaB 002 <br />a. Testingand Reporting Requirements <br />WET [esting shall be required whenever [he discharge contains any flow from mine drainage and/or spoils spring <br />sources. WET [esting is not required when a discharge consists entirely of surface runoff. If discharge from outfall <br />002 contains mine drainage at any time during the appropriate monitoring Crequency period, WET testing is <br />required during that period. Tests shall be done at the frequency listed in Part I.B.I. Test results shall be <br />reported along with the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) submitted for the reporting period during which <br />the sample was taken, (i.e., WET testing results for the first calendar quatter ending March 31 shall be reported <br />with the DMR due April 28.) The results shall be submitted on the Acute Toxicity Tes[ repott forth, available <br />• from the Division. Copies of these reports are to be submitted to both the Division and EPA along with the <br />DMR. ~q <br />Amendment No. 1 Issued .1lJN 2 8~0~~ Effective <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.