My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE62241
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE62241
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:08:41 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:28:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Report of Subsidence Study (6/83) and Addendum
Section_Exhibit Name
VOLUME 3- SUBSIDENCE STUDY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Upper bound and lower bound estimates of subsidence for <br />eight foot and ten foot extraction heights are plotted on <br />Plate 13. Calculations based on Wilson's (1972) yielding <br />pillar design method indicate that failure of the barrier <br />pillars between mining panels will occur when the overburden <br />height reaches about 500 feet. At overburden heights of less <br />than 500 feet, subsidence would be better estimated by <br />superposition of subsidence profiles from adjacent panels. <br />In practice, the bottom of the subsidence trough will <br />be uneven to some extent, with humps present in the profile <br />immediately above pillars. The actual profile could be <br />estimated by superposition of subsidence profiles of <br />individual panels if the pillars remained stable. However, <br />this method cannot be used where the pillars are likely to <br />col lapse (SEH, 1975, p. 22). <br />Actual subsidence at the proposed mine will probably <br />lie considerably closer to the conservative estimate than to <br />that predicted by the method of Abel and Lee because of the <br />method of extraction. For this reason, and to insure that <br />subsidence is not underestimated, the conservative values <br />have been used for all quantitative subsidence estimates. <br />• Subsidence Profile <br />The shape and size of the subsidence profile which <br />typically forms above an extracted seam depends on the <br />relationship between the width of the mined zone (w) and its <br />depth (h). All extras*_ion areas having the same ratio of <br />w/h result in the same maximum subsidence, S. Maximum sub- <br />sidence generally occurs over the center of the extracted <br />zone and will equal the maximum possible subsidence (Sm~x) <br />only if the extraction area exceeds a certain critical size <br />termed the critical area. For sub-critical extraction areas, <br />the maximum subsidence will be less than the maximum <br />possible subsidence. For super-critical extraction areas, <br />the subsidence equals the maximum possible subsidence over <br />the central portion of the subsidence profile for a width <br />equal to the amount by which the extraction width exceeds <br />the critical width. <br />The accuracy with which the subsidence profile can be <br />predicted is limited in mining regions where there has been <br />no previous measurement of subsidence profiles. The SEH <br />method can be used to obtain the general form of the curve, <br />but the profile obtained will be in error by an unknown <br />amount. <br />• - 34 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.